top of page
Life coaching
White Structure

Positive psychology interventions in tertiary education

Introduction

Historically, psychologists and other mental health practitioners were primarily motivated to diminish or to prevent unpleasant emotions in their clients, from anxiety, depression, trauma, and disappointment to anger, frustration, and envy.  In more recent decades, however, health practitioners recognized this approach is limited and may not foster the range of pleasant and positive emotions that individuals experience.  That is, many of these pleasant states—such as a sense of meaning, growth, creativity, social connection, fulfillment, and even happiness—are not merely the absence of negative states.  Consequently, practitioners developed a range of interventions that were designed to foster these positive emotions, collective called positive psychology interventions (see Seligman, 2019).  These interventions include

 

To illustrate, Seligman, Rashid, and Parks (2006) developed a procedure that was designed to enhance happiness.  Some participants were assigned to an intervention, demanding two hours a week over six weeks.  In the first session, participants identified their key strengths and attempted to apply these strengths to their daily life.  During the second session, participants contemplated three positive events during the day.  In the third session, these participants imagined how they would like to be described during their obituary. Fourth, these individuals wrote or read a letter to someone, expressing gratitude. Fifth, they learnt how to react positively and enthusiastically to favorable news from someone else.  Finally, the participants learnt how to savor and enjoy daily experiences, like walking to class.  The remaining participants were assigned to a control group, in which they were not exposed to any intervention.

 

Unsurprisingly, this intervention did improve the emotions that individuals experienced.  More importantly, these benefits persisted at least 12 months. Even one year later, individuals who had been exposed to the intervention, compared to the other participants, were more likely to report feelings of happiness and less likely to report feeling of depression. 

 

Case study 1: An intervention in the United Arab Emirates

Researchers and practitioners have applied positive psychology interventions in many settings.  However, until almost 2020, few studies have explored the benefits of positive psychology interventions to university students.  Therefore, the research that Lambert et al. (2019) conducted, to explore the effects of a positive psychology program, in a United Arab Emirates university, was a pioneering study.  The participants were primarily expatriate student, living in Dubai, enrolled in a four-year undergraduate program.  About half the participants attended a program that lasted 14 weeks.  Specifically, during this program

 

  • Weeks 1 and 2: Participants learn about how to apply mindfulness, how to prevent overthinking, and how to record positive thoughts.  They were also introduced to the notion and goals of positive psychology

  • Weeks 3 and 4: Participants learned about how to write or think about positive experiences, savor positive experiences, and think optimistically but realistically.  They were also exposed to the PERMA framework, underscoring the importance of pleasure, engagement, relationships, meaning, and achievement, as well as the broaden and build theory—the notion that positive emotions broaden attention, facilitating the development of skills that promote resilience

  • Weeks 5 and 6: Participants learned to apply positive self-talk and let go of negative emotions.  They also discussed pathways to engagement and flow. 

  • Weeks 7 and 8: Participants learned techniques such as three good things, plan a date, and active-constructive responding as well as pathways to improve relationships

  • Weeks 9 and 10: Participants learned how to initiate good deeds, write gratitude letters, and retreat from social media—as well as other pathways to community relationships

  • Weeks 11 and 12: Participants learned how to imagine their possible self, set goals, and apply the how to be remembered family tree, while discussing pathways to meaning and achievement.

 

Participants completed a variety of measures to assess the degree to which they experience pleasant emotions and a sense of flourishing.  They completed these measures both the program, immediately after the program, as well as three months after the program.  Relative to a control group of students who did not complete this program, students who completed this program were more likely to experience happiness and feel they were flourishing, even three months after the program ended.  As the measures indicated, participants tended to feel their happiness was robust and not susceptible to unexpected adversities. 

 

Case study 2: An online intervention

Yurayat and Seechaliao (2021) conducted a study to explore whether positive psychology interventions could be introduced online.  The participants comprised 24 Thai undergraduate students, half of whom received the intervention online.  The other participants received no intervention.  The online intervention did indeed improve measures of wellbeing, such as pleasure, engagement, mastery, and relationships. 

 

Case study 3: An intervention to explore other benefits

Hammill et al. (2022) also explored the benefits of positive psychology interventions at a university.  This study, however, also examined how these interventions affect student engagement.   Specifically, all participants—who were students at an Australian university—were exposed to one of two interventions or to no intervention.

 

The first intervention comprised six positive psychology interventions.  All these interventions were embedded within the course activities.  Specifically,

 

  • before each class, participants received an email link to a motivating video

  • before each class, a positive, encouraging, or uplifting message was posted on the learning management system

  • early each week, participants were encouraged to send a thank you text to a friend or relative, in response to moment of kindness the previous seven days

  • each week, participants were reminded to be maintain a sense of presence or awareness during classes, rather than become distracted with their own thoughts or technologies, epitomizing a feature of mindfulness

  • in a team, during each class, participants discussed a positive event they experienced and one of their strengths. 

 

The second intervention was equivalent, except two of the interventions were omitted: the motivational videos and the thank you texts.  This change was arranged to diminish the workload imposed on students

 

Before and after the interventions, the students completed questions that assess their level of engagement.  For example, they indicated the degree to which they felt engaged in the learning process, connected to people at the university, motivated to progress academically, and happy at the university.  Contrary to hypotheses, these interventions did not significantly improve these measures of engagement.  Indeed, only a small percentage of students completed the various activities, especially the activities they were instructed to complete alone.  To explain these findings, the authors proposed that perhaps

 

  • this intervention is not as effective to all disciplines; in this study, the participants were business students, enrolled in a marketing course, and thus may not have perceived the materials as relevant to their careers.  In previous studies, the participants who benefit from these interventions are often psychology students, who may perceive the materials as more relevant to their careers

  • the interventions were applied to the entire class, potentially diminishing the likelihood that students immersed themselves in the activities

 

Specific interventions: Gratitude

Positive psychology interventions, when implemented collectively, can enhance the wellbeing and flourishing of individuals.  Nevertheless, prolonged interventions consume time and can increase the workload of students, potentially explaining the unflattering effects of positive psychology interventions that Hammill et al. (2022) reported.  To override this problem, practitioners may need to decide which positive psychology interventions to introduce.  This document thus discusses the key interventions in turn.  

Several studies show that attempts to experience gratitude can evoke positive emotions and enhance wellbeing.  In one study, conducted by Seligman, Steen, Park, and Peterson (2005), some participants were asked to write a letter to someone, expressing gratitude.  They were then encouraged to deliver this letter.  Relative to participants who were assigned to a control group, and merely wrote about some of their early memories, participants who expressed gratitude experienced more happiness and less depression one month later.

 

Practitioners can introduce other instructions to promote gratitude.  For example, Locklear et al. (2021) instructed participants to consider many facets of their work for which they are grateful, such as supportive colleagues, the contributions of other people, opportunities at work, or just gratitude to the prospect of work.  These individuals were also prompted to consider facets they had not considered before.  As this caveat implies, individuals should not practice gratitude interventions too often, because the novelty of their thoughts diminishes over time.    

 

Interestingly, exercises in which individuals experience gratitude can enhance the wellbeing of some people but diminish the wellbeing of other people.  Specifically, in one study, conducted by Sergeant and Mongrain (2011), some participants completed a gratitude exercise: They were asked, each day, to recall five things for which they were grateful.  Other participants listened to uplifting music.  Finally, some participants were exposed to neither of these interventions.

 

At several times, participants also completed various measures of wellbeing, such as depression, self-esteem, and happiness.  In addition, they were asked to indicate the degree to which they are self-critical or needy. 

 

If self-critical, participants were especially likely to benefit from the gratitude exercise relative to the other conditions.  That is, the gratitude exercise was especially likely to enhance happiness, but not necessarily curb depression, in self-critical individuals.  However, if needy, participants reported a lower self-esteem if exposed to the gratitude exercise or music relative to neither of these procedures.  Perhaps, the gratitude and music did not fulfill, and may have impeded, the needs of these individuals to feel connected to other people. 

 

Furthermore, Ruini and Vescovelli (2013) showed that gratitude can also foster post traumatic growth.  Post traumatic growth reflects the degree to which individuals feel that a trauma has facilitated their relationships, uncovered other pursuits or possibilities in the future, developed their strengths, enhanced their appreciation of life, and fostered a spiritual awakening.

 

Specifically, in this study, the participants had been diagnosed with breast cancer and had undergone treatment.  They completed questionnaires that gauge the degree to which they feel gratitude in general (e.g., "I feel thankful for what I have experienced in life"), experienced post traumatic growth and psychological well-being, as well as endure physical and psychological symptoms.  Gratitude was shown to foster all facets of post traumatic growth, such as relationships, personal strengths, and awareness of meaningful possibilities.  Furthermore, gratitude reduced symptoms of anxiety, depression, and hostility.

 

Several theories have been proposed to explain the role or benefits of gratitude—such as the moral affect theory of gratitude, the find-remind-and bind theory of gratitude, self-regulation theory, and social exchange theory (Locklear et al., 2021).  To illustrate, gratitude may have evolved to facilitate social exchange.  Without gratitude, individuals would not reciprocate the support of one another.  Cooperation would thus diminish.  Therefore, gratitude encourages individuals to perceive one another as affiliates who could help each other and, for example, increases the likelihood that people will mimic one another (Jia, Lee, & Tong, 2015)—a sign of trust and affiliation.  Therefore, when individuals feel grateful, they are more likely to perceive their friends, family, or colleagues as cooperative, fostering a sense of safety.

 

Alternatively, and consistent with the work of Locklear et al. (2021), gratitude might inspire people to orient their attention towards positive features of their life.  This awareness of positive features diminishes their need to attend to concerns, worries, and other problems.  Consequently, they do not feel as depleted or exhausted.  Instead, they feel more invigorated.   

Three good things in life

In some instances, participants are instructed to transcribe, each night for a week, three positive events that transpired during the day as well as the causes of these events.  This procedure has also been shown to enhance wellbeing.

 

For example, in the study reported by Seligman, Steen, Park, and Peterson (2005), some participants were asked to undertake this procedure.  Compared to participants who were assigned to a control group, participants who reflected on three positive events experienced more happiness and less depression even six months later.

 

In contrast, as Bahník et al. (2015) revealed, this exercise may diminish negative emotions but not necessarily enhance positive emotions or life satisfaction.  This research also revealed the number of positive events that people are asked to transcribe does not affect the magnitude of these benefits

 

Best possible selves

The best possible selves is an activity in which individuals write about the feelings and events they would experience if their life unfolded as favorably as possible in various domains, such as work, school, social life, or health.  They are asked to think about the best possible life that could actually unfold in some setting, such as university; receiving excellent grades may be an example.  Individuals are usually instructed to write for 10 minutes or so with any style they like.  Next, they dedicate 5 minutes, writing about a specific goal or activity that could facilitate this best possible self.

 

Relative to participants who merely wrote about the activities they completed over the last 24 hours, participants who completed the best possible selves exercise experienced elevated levels of positive affect.  They also experienced more flow.  Indeed, many studies have confirmed this exercise enhances facets of wellbeing (King 2001; Lyubomirsky et al. 2011; Peters et al. 2010; for a review, see Loveday et al., 2018).  These benefits were especially pronounced if participants had first read positive testimonials about this approach from other students-—but did not depend on whether or not the exercise was completed online. 

 

Presumably, this exercise increases the degree to which inspiring consequences are vivid; vivid images tend to be perceived as more feasible.  Consequently, individuals may feel more confident about achieving their goals in the future, promoting positive emotions.  Testimonials from other people may increase the effort that people devote to this task, generating more vivid and compelling depictions of the future.

 

Optimism

The best possible selves intervention overlaps with practices that have been designed to foster optimism.  For example, Shapira and Mongrain (2010) implemented and assessed a procedure that fosters optimism.  Specifically, each day, over a week, participants were asked to envisage a positive future, perhaps 1 to 10 years from now, in various facets of their life: family, relationships, and work for example. They were then asked to write about these positive possibilities as well as existing issues they had solved in the future.  They attempted to write about their activities at this time as vividly as possible.  In addition, they were instructed to convey to themselves sage advice and important insights from the perspective of this future person.

 

In the control condition, each day, over the week, participants were asked to write about an early memory of their life.  They described the activities they were undertaking, the feelings they were experiencing, and the people with whom they were interacting, if they could remember.

 

One week, one month, three months, and six months after this intervention, participants completed a series of measures that assessed their wellbeing.  These measured included scales that gauge depression and happiness.  Furthermore, they completed a questionnaire of self-criticism, neediness, and connectedness. Relative to the control condition, this optimism condition increased happiness over the next six months.  This intervention diminished depression over the next three months. 

 

Peters, Flink, and Boersma, and Linton (2010) developed another protocol to elicit optimism.  Specifically, in this study, to elicit optimism, some participants wrote about their best possible self for 15 minutes. That is, they were asked to imagine their life if everything unfolded as they wanted. They were instructed to envisage that perhaps they have worked diligently and achieved their most important dreams.  Once this image had been evoked, they wrote about this future for 15 minutes.  Afterwards, they formed a vivid image of this account for 5 minutes. In the control condition, participants wrote about a typical day, but otherwise received similar instructions.

 

After they completed these exercises, they completed a measure of positive and negative affect.  In addition, they answered questions that gauge the likelihood they feel that various positive and negative events will unfold, regardless of mood. For example, they were asked to indicate the likelihood they will become unwell or attract admiration.  Relative to the control condition, contemplation about the best possible self increased positive emotions and also augmented the perceived likelihood of positive events, representing optimism.  Presumably, when individuals form vivid images of positive events, related consequences seem more probable.  That is, events that can be imagined clearly seem more likely.

 

Hope

According to Snyder, Harris, Anderson, Holleran, Irving, and Sigmon et al. (1991), hope comprises two facets, called pathways and agency (see also Snyder, 2002). The concept of pathways represents the capacity of individuals to formulate plans to pursue their goals, uncovering alternative avenues and opportunities if obstacles arise.  Agency represents the excitement, energy, determination, and commitment that is needed to maintain these pathways.

 

Cheavens, Feldman, Gum, Scott, and Snyder (2006) implemented an intervention that was designed to elicit a sense of hope.  Some participants completed eight group sessions, each lasting two hours. During these sessions, participants discussed exercises such as setting meaningful and plausible goals, uncovering opportunities to fulfill these goals, unearthing sources of motivation to maintain this pursuit and prevent obstacles, evaluating progress, and modifying these goals and plans when necessary.  Relative to a wait list control, these sessions were shown to improve agency, self-esteem, and purpose as well as contain anxiety.

 

Feldman and Dreher (2011) examined whether a session that lasts only 90 minutes is sufficient to foster hope.  In this session, participants were first instructed to identify a goal they would like to achieve over the next 6 months, such as lose weight or learn a skill.  Over the next 20 minutes, they learn about hope, such as the importance of tangible goals, the need to identify pathways to achieve these goals, and techniques to instill a sense of agency.  Third, on a piece of paper, participants transcribed their goals, recorded three steps they could achieve to fulfill this goal, and some obstacles that could impede each step, together with alternative pathways around these obstacles.  In addition, they considered how they could maintain their motivation and capacity to complete these steps.  Finally, they completed a visualization task in which they imagined how they would circumvent these obstacles, using all five senses to construct a vivid image. In the control condition, participants either completed a relaxation exercise or no exercise at all.

 

Participants completed a questionnaire before this intervention, after this intervention, and one month later.  The questionnaire gauged a sense of hope and purpose in life.  Progress on the goal was also assessed a month after the intervention.   Relative to relaxation only, the hope intervention did enhance hope and purpose in life initially, but this improvement was not sustained a month later.  However, the hope intervention, relative to the control groups, did enhance progress on the goal a month later.

 

Savoring

Savoring refers to strategies that people use to maintain, or even to augment, their positive experiences (Bryant, 1989, 2003; see also Jose et al., 2012, 2021).   Quoidbach, Berry, Hansenne, and Mikolajczak (2010) examined the utility of four spontaneous, rather than induced, savoring techniques.  The first technique is called behavioral display in which individuals exhibit their positive affect through mannerisms and gestures, like smiling or pumping the air with their fist.  The second technique is called being present and refers to deliberately maintaining attention on their immediate experience (for evidence of utility, see Bryant, 2003).   The third technique is called capitalizing, in which individuals celebrate positive events with other people.  The final technique is called positive mental time travel in which individuals remember past positive events or anticipate future positive events.

 

Furthermore, Quoidbach, Berry, Hansenne, and Mikolajczak (2010) also explored the impact of four dampening strategies—behaviors that, usually inadvertently, curtail positive experiences.   The first strategy was suppression in which individuals attempt to repress or conceal positive feelings, perhaps because of modesty, shyness, or superstition.  The second strategy is distraction in which individuals contemplate, or often worry about, issues that are unrelated to the positive experience. The third strategy is fault finding in which individuals direct attention to the shortfalls or limitations of some positive experience.  The final strategy is negative mental time travel in which individuals attribute positive events to causes they could not control or imagine negative implications.

 

In particular, Quoidbach, Berry, Hansenne, and Mikolajczak (2010) investigated whether these strategies are associated with positive affect and life satisfaction.  Being present and positive mental time travel were positively associated with positive affect, whereas capitalizing was positively associated with life satisfaction.  Distraction was inversely associated with positive affect, and fault finding as well as negative mental time travel was negatively related to life satisfaction.  Finally, individuals who utilized several savoring strategies, instead of only one of these techniques, were especially likely to experience this positive affect or life satisfaction. This application of many techniques might ensure sufficient variety and flexibility in the strategies that people adopt.

 

Despite the benefits of savoring, various circumstances and experiences can diminish the likelihood that individuals will apply this approach.  Specifically, according to Quoidbach, Dunn, Hansenne, and Bustin (2015), when people feel that some experience is readily accessible or abundant, their tendency to savor diminishes.  In contrast, if some experience is perceived as scarce, savoring is more likely.

 

To illustrate, as these researchers showed, if individuals have visited many rather than few nations before, they are not as likely to savor pleasant but ordinary trips in the future.  They do not reflect upon these trips afterwards or mindfully savor these trips during the experience.  Even if participants are prompted to believe they have travelled extensively, they become less inclined to savor.  For example, if asked which of several common, rather than uncommon destinations they have visited--and thus tick many options, people feel they have travelled extensively; this procedure also diminishes the likelihood they will savor in the future.   

Signature strengths

Proponents of positive psychology interventions often introduce an intervention in which participants contemplate their signature or core strengths and then consider how they can apply these strengths in their work or daily lives.  For example, in one study, conducted by Seligman, Steen, Park, and Peterson (2005), participants were instructed to identify their signature strengths.   In addition, they were instructed to apply these strengths everyday, creatively and industriously. A rise in happiness and a diminution in depressive symptoms lasted at least six months.

 

To identify their signature strengths, participants may complete the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths—although scholars have also constructed shorter versions.  This questionnaire comprises 240 items, in which respondents report the degree to which they feel they exhibit various traits.  The questionnaire measures 24 different strengths, each relating to 10 items.

 

  • Creativity: Identifying novel and productive avenues to complete tasks

  • Curiosity: An interest in all ongoing experiences

  • Open mindedness: Examining every position and perspective thoroughly

  • Love of learning: Mastering novel skills and developing expertise

  • Perspective: The capacity to provide counsel and guidance to other individuals

  • Authenticity: Behaving in a genuine, truthful way

  • Bravery: Not shirking a responsibility or goal merely because of threats, difficulties, or pain

  • Persistence: Completing the tasks they begin

  • Zest: Experiencing excitement and energy during life

  • Kindness: Engaging in altruistic acts for other individuals

  • Love: Cherishing close relationships

  • Social intelligence: An awareness of the motives and feelings of individuals

  • Fairness: Treating other individuals equitably and fairly, without prejudice or favor

  • Leadership: The capacity to organize group activities and to provide direction and inspiration

  • Teamwork: The ability to collaborate effectively in team settings

  • Forgiveness: The tendency to forgive wrongdoers

  • Modesty: Abstaining from the need to inflate or highlight achievements

  • Prudence: Avoiding statements or activities that might be regretted later

  • Self-regulation: The regulation of emotions, motivations, and actions

  • Appreciation of beauty and excellence: The recognition and respect towards skill, excellent, and beauty

  • Gratitude: Feeling thankful to the positive facets of life

  • Hope: Expecting positive outcomes, and recognizing pathways to achieve these outcomes

  • Humor: The capacity to laugh, tease, and elicit smiling in other individuals

  • Spirituality: A sense of purpose and meaning in life

 

As Wood, Linley, Maltby, Kashdan, and Hurling (2010) showed, in a longitudinal study, the use or application of strengths seems to curb stress and increase self-esteem and vitality.  In this study, participants completed a measure that gauges the extent to which they utilize their strengths. Typical questions include "I achieve what I want by using my strengths", "I am able to use my strengths in lots of different ways", and "My work gives me lots of opportunities to use my strengths".  In addition, participants completed measures of perceived stress over the last month, self-esteem, and vitality.  The measure of vitality included questions like "I feel alive and vital".  These measures, apart from the questions on the degree to which they utilize their strengths, were administered on three occasions, over the six months.

 

Application of strengths at one time was associated with reduced stress as well as increased self-esteem and vitality three and six months later.  These findings confirm the benefits that apply when individuals are granted opportunities to apply their strengths.

 

Likewise, Littman-Ovadia and Steger (2010) showed that individuals are more likely to experience wellbeing and job satisfaction if they are granted opportunities to utilize their strengths.  In this project, participants were asked to specify the degree to which they are granted an opportunity to utilize the various strengths, stipulated in the inventory of strengths, during work.  These opportunities were positively associated with measures of psychological wellbeing and job satisfaction.

 

Even the recognition of personal strengths is positively associated with some outcomes.  As Littman-Ovadia and Steger (2010) demonstrated, when individuals endorse many character strengths, they are more likely to experience a sense of meaning.  In particular, participants completed the questionnaire that establishes the extent to which they feel they exhibit various character strengths.  In addition, they completed a measure of meaning, epitomized by items like "My life has a clear purpose".  Endorsement of these strengths was positively associated with meaning—-an association that was replicated in paid and voluntary workers as well as adolescents and adults.  Presumably, when individuals endorse these strengths, they feel they have developed the qualities to pursue a personal niche, integral to meaning.

 

Louis (2011) distinguishes two variants of strength interventions: talent identification and strength development.  When talent identification is implemented, participants often complete surveys that uncover sets of talents or competencies that could evolve into strengths.  That is, the practitioner focusses their attention on the identification, rather than development, of talents.  In contrast, when strength development is implemented, participants also reflect upon how they can cultivate their strengths.  They identify opportunities to develop these talents.

 

According to Louis (2011), talent identification, in contrast to strength development, can provoke a complication.  Talent identification may imply that such capabilities are inherent.  Consequently, individuals do not feel they can as readily cultivate their strengths, called an entity or fixed theory.    Once they adopt this perspective, their resilience diminishes.  They do not feel they can change as readily and, therefore, become more sensitive to criticism and other complications. 

 

Louis (2011) undertook a study to confirm this possibility.  All participants, apart from individuals assigned to a control group, completed the Clifton Strength Finder, intended to uncover their talents.   Participants who were assigned to the talent identification group then undertook exercises that confirm these strengths.  These exercises lasted about 200 minutes, dispersed over four weeks.  For example, participants reflected upon how these talents may have facilitated previous successes or achievements.

 

Participants who were assigned to the strength development group undertook exercises that highlight the possibility of development.  During these exercises, people were informed that talents can be underutilized or overutilized.  They were informed that talents need to be refined and developed, with exposure to knowledge and practice, to translate into strengths.  Participants were then encouraged to uncover novel techniques, and to identify opportunities, that could be utilized to develop their strengths.  They also reflected on actions they have undertaken in the past to develop their strengths.

 

Finally, before and after these interventions, participants completed a measure that assesses the degree to which they adopt an entity or fixed theory.  After talent identification, but not skill development, participants were more inclined to assume that capabilities and character are fixed rather than malleable.  Hence, talent identification, without skill development, can provoke some problems.

Perceived employability

As Petruzziello et al. (2023) revealed, when students perceive themselves as employable—that is, when they feel they are acquiring the skills and capabilities that employers value—their wellbeing improves.  That is, if students perceive themselves as employable, they feel they will soon accrue the resources they need to resolve their challenges.  They feel their obstacles now are solvable rather than overwhelming, diminishing stress.  In contrast, if students do not perceive themselves as employable, they feel they might not accrue the resources they need to solve their problems in the future.  So, minor challenges feel insurmountable, amplifying their stress.

 

According to Petruzziello et al. (2023), universities and other tertiary education institutions can increase the degree to which students perceive themselves as employable.  Specifically, when teaching staff provide the right support, students are more likely to perceive themselves as employable.  For example

 

  • when lecturers inspire students to solve problems collaboratively, students exchange information about career skills and job opportunities, promoting their perceived employability

  • when lecturers present examples that relate theory to practice, students recognize their knowledge is more relevant to their careers

  • when lecturers speak to students about career opportunities, students obviously feel more employable

 

Petruzziello et al. (2023) indeed confirmed the argument that teacher support is positively associated with perceived employability and wellbeing.  In this study, 127 university students completed a questionnaire at three times.  The survey assessed the degree to which students feel their skills and capabilities are attractive to employers, perceive their teachers as employable, and experience wellbeing.  To measure support from teachers, the questions revolved around whether teachers encourage collaboration with peers and discuss career opportunities with students.  Teacher support mediated the association between perceived employability of students and their wellbeing.   

 

References

  • Algoe, S. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 455-469.

  • Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529-550.

  • Bahník, Š., Vranka, M., & Dlouhá, J. (2015). X good things in life: Processing fluency effects in the “Three good things in life” exercise. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 91-97

  • Basso, M. R., Schefft, B. K., Ris, M. D., & Dember, W. N. (1996). Mood and global-local visual processing. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 249-255.

  • Bernardo, A. B. J. (2010). Extending hope theory: Internal and external locus of trait hope.  Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 944-949.

  • Bryant, F. B. (1989). A four-factor model of perceived control: Avoiding, coping, obtaining, and savoring. Journal of Personality, 57, 773-797.

  • Bryant, F. B. (2003). Savoring Beliefs Inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savouring. Journal of Mental Health, 12, 175-196.

  • Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Bryant, F. B., Smart, C. M., & King, S. P. (2005). Using the past to enhance the present: Boosting happiness through positive reminiscence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 227-260.

  • Burns, A. B., Brown, J. S., Sachs-Ericsson, N., Plant, E. A., Curtis, J. T., Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. E. (2008). Upward spirals of positive emotion and coping: Replication, extension, and initial exploration of neurochemical substrates.  Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 360-370.

  • Cheavens, J.  S., Feldman, D. B., Gum, A., Scott, T. M., & Snyder, C. R. (2006).  Hope therapy in a community sample:  A pilot investigation.  Social Indicators Research, 77, 61-86.

  • Cohn, M. A., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). Beyond the moment, beyond the self: shared ground between selective investment theory and the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 39-44.

  • Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Neidenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167-196). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  • Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasant emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 301-331.

  • Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J. (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 117-135.

  • Feldman, D. B., & Dreher, D. E. (2011). Can hope be changed in 90 minutes? Testing the efficacy of a single-session goal-pursuit intervention for college students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 745-759. doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9292-4

  • Fordyce, M. W. (1983). A program to increase happiness: Further studies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 483-498.

  • Geiger, K. A., & Kwon, P. (2010). Rumination and depressive symptoms: Evidence for the moderating role of hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 391-395.

  • Hammill, J., Nguyen, T., & Henderson, F. (2022). Student engagement: The impact of positive psychology interventions on students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 129-142.

  • Henricksen, A., & Stephens, C. (2013). The happiness-enhancing activities and positive practices inventory (HAPPI): Development and validation.  Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 81-98. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9317-z

  • Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.

  • Jia, L. Lee, L. N., & Tong, E. M. W. (2015). Gratitude facilitates behavioral mimicry. Emotion, 15(2), 134-138. doi: 0.1037/emo0000022

  • Johnson, K. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2005). "We all look the same to me". Positive emotions eliminate the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 875-881.

  • Jose, P. E., Bryant, F. B., & Macaskill, E. (2021). Savor now and also reap the rewards later: amplifying savoring predicts greater uplift frequency over time. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(6), 738-748.

  • Jose, P. E., Lim, B. T., & Bryant, F. B. (2012). Does savoring increase happiness? A daily diary study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(3), 176–187.

  • Kahn, B. E., & Isen, A. M. (1993). The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 257-270.

  • King, L. A. (2001). The health benefits of writing about life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 798-807.

  • Lambert, L., Passmore, H. A., & Joshanloo, M. (2019). A positive psychology intervention program in a culturally-diverse university: Boosting happiness and reducing fear. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1141-1162.

  • Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013).  What is the optimal way to deliver a positive activity intervention? The case of writing about one’s best possible selves.  Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 635-654.  doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9346-2

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Levenson, R. W. (1994). Human emotions: A functional view. In P. Ekman & R. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 123-126). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Littman-Ovadia, H.,  & Steger, M. (2010). Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model . Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 419 -430.  

  • Locklear, L. R., Taylor, S. G., & Ambrose, M. L. (2021). How a gratitude intervention influences workplace mistreatment: A multiple mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106, 1314–1331

  • Louis, M. C. (2011). Strengths interventions in higher education: The effect of identification versus development approaches on implicit self-theory. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 204-215.  doi: 10.1080/17439760.2011.570366

  • Loveday, P. M., Lovell, G. P., & Jones, C. M. (2018). The best possible selves intervention: A review of the literature to evaluate efficacy and guide future research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(2), 607-628.

  • Lyubomirsky, S., Dickerhoof, R., Boehm, J. K., & Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: An experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being. Emotion, 11, 391-402.

  • Mathews, M. A., & Shook, N. J. (2013).  Promoting or preventing thanks: Regulatory focus and its effect on gratitude and indebtedness.  Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 191-195.  doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.001

  • Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 603-619.   doi:10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748.

  • Peters, M. L., Flink, I. K., Boersma, K., & Linton, S. J. (2010). Manipulating optimism: Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 204-211.

  • Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 17-26.

  • Peterson, S. J., Gerhardt, M. W., & Rode, J. C. (2006). Hope, learning goals, and task performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1099-1109.

  • Petruzziello, G., Mariani, M. G., Guglielmi, D., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., de Jong, J. P., & Chiesa, R. (2023). The role of teaching staff in fostering perceived employability of university students. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 20–36

  • Price, T.  F., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The effect of embodied emotive states on cognitive categorization. Emotion, 10, 934-938.

  • Proctor, C., Tsukayama, E., Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Eades, J. F., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths Gym: The impact of a character strengths based intervention on the life satisfaction and wellbeing of adolescents.  Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 377-388.  doi: 10.1080/17439760.2011.594079 

  • Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013).  What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being?  The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-oriented behaviour, physical fitness, and the subjective health status.  Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 222-232. 

  • Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013).  Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction.  Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 275-292. doi 10.1007/s10902-012-9331-9

  • Psychology Bulletin, 41(3), 393-404. doi: 10.1177/0146167214566189 

  • Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 368-373.

  • Quoidbach, J., Dunn, E. W., Hansenne, M., & Bustin, G. (2015).  The price of abundance: how a wealth of experiences impoverishes savouring. Personality and Social

  • Raghunathan, R., & Trope, Y. (2002). Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: Mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 510-525.

  • Rash, J. A., Matsuba, M. K., & Prkachin, K. M. (2011). Gratitude and well‐being: Who benefits the most from a gratitude intervention?. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3(3), 350-369.

  • Reisberg, D., & Heuer, F. (2004). Memory for emotional events. In D. Reisberg & P. Hertel (Eds.), Memory and emotion (pp. 3-41). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Rubin, D. C. (2006). The basic-systems model of episodic memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 277-311.

  • Ruini, C., & Vescovelli, F. (2013). The role of gratitude in breast cancer: its relationships with post-traumatic growth, psychological well-being and distress.  Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 263-274. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9330-x

  • Seligman, M. E. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 1-23.

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410-421.

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N. P., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410-421.

  • Sergeant, S., & Mongrain, M. (2011). Are positive psychology exercises helpful for people with depressive personality styles? Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 260-272. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2011.570366

  • Shapira, L. B., & Mongrain, M. (2010).  The benefits of self-compassion and optimism exercises for individuals vulnerable to depression.  Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 377-389.

  • Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 467-487.

  • Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 249-275.

  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T. et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570-585.

  • Talarico, J. M., Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2009). Positive emotions enhance recall of peripheral details. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 380-398.

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375-424.

  • Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2007). Regulation of positive emotions: Emotion regulation strategies that promote resilience. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 311-333.

  • Wadlinger, H. A., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2006). Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 89-101.

  • Waugh, C. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93-106.

  • Waugh, C. E., Fredrickson, B. L., & Taylor, S. F. (2008). Adapting to life's slings and arrows: Individual differences in resilience when recovering from an anticipated threat. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1031-1046.

  • Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2010). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 15-19.

  • Yurayat, P., & Seechaliao, T. (2021). Effectiveness of online positive psychology intervention on psychological well-being among undergraduate students. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(4), 143-155.

White Structure

Self-compassion

Introduction

All tertiary education institutions strive to enhance not only the learning but also the wellbeing and satisfaction of their students.  Yet, many staff inadvertently express comments or initiate behaviors that impair the wellbeing of students.  For example, to motivate the class, teachers might deliver feedback that unintentionally elicits shame in some of their students.  This shame can diminish a mental state, called self-compassion.  As self-compassion declines, students are susceptible to a range of problems, from mental illness to unhealthy behavior.      

 

Therefore, to enhance the wellbeing of students, teaching staff need to be attuned to some of the determinants and nuances of self-compassion.  Individuals experience self-compassion adopt three distinct, but interrelated beliefs (Neff, 2003a, b). First, when individuals demonstrate self-compassion, they accept themselves and perceive themselves as worthy, despite their perceived deficiencies, faults, or afflictions. Second, these individuals recognize that pain and failure are inevitable, universal features of human experience.  They do not feel a sense of isolation or alienation after failures. Third, these individuals show a balanced perspective of themselves and their emotions—neither disregarding nor inflating adverse thoughts of feelings.  In short, individuals who are self-compassionate accept their flaws, perceive their failings as universal to all humans, and consider their limitations calmly (Neff, 2003a, 2003b). They do not, in contrast, feel contempt towards their shortcomings, feel isolated when they fail on some task, or reflect upon their errors and deficiencies inordinately (Neff, 2003a, 2003b)

 

Consequences of self-compassion: Wellbeing

Self-compassion tends to benefit individuals.  For example, when people experience self-compassion, they are not as susceptible to anxiety, depression, rumination, and maladaptive forms of perfectionism (Neff, 2003a) but experience greater wellbeing (for a meta-analysis, see Chio et al., 2021).  Similarly, self-compassion diminishes the stress that individuals experience during change, such as transition from school to college (Kroshus et al., 2021). Conversely, self-compassion is positively associated with pleasant states: optimism, resilience, and life satisfaction, coupled with a feeling of social connection (Neff, 2003a; Neff, Rude, & Kirkpatrick, 2007; Pérez-Aranda et al., 2021).

 

Arguably, self-compassion reminds individuals, perhaps unconsciously, of times in which they received compassion from another person—perhaps a parent or friend.  These memories could elicit feelings of safety and security, diminishing unpleasant emotions.   

 

Consequences of self-compassion: Health behaviors

In general, if people report self-compassion, they tend to live a healthier life. For example, they are more likely to seek medical attention in response to health concerns. They are also more likely to initiate behaviors that improve health.

 

To illustrate, in one study, conducted by Terry, Leary, Mehta, and Henderson (2013), participants who were afflicted with a medical problem completed a series of scales. First, they competed a measure of self-control that comprises only 12 items.  Second, they described an existing medical problem and indicated the degree to which they follow the recommendations of their doctor. In addition, they completed scales that could explain why self-compassion affects health behaviors, including the degree to which they like to be kind to themselves (e.g., "I think I should do something nice for myself"), the extent to which they speak benevolently to themselves (e.g., "I remind myself that almost everyone has medical problems"), and the degree to which they like to be proactive about health (e.g., "I am very assertive when it comes to my physical health").

 

As hypothesized, self-compassion was positively associated with the extent to which participants followed the recommendations of their doctor and coped with the distress of their illness. This relationship was mediated by the degree to which participants were kind to themselves, speak benevolently to themselves, and behave proactively about their health. Other studies showed that self-compassion promotes healthy behaviors, such as seeking medical attention, even after controlling self-control or the motivation of individuals to achieve their goals. Finally, some studies show that people who are self-compassionate feel less distress in response to health complaints.

 

Conceivably, when people feel self-compassion, they are not as likely to feel ashamed of their frailties or distress. Consequently, rather than avoid thoughts about these predicaments, they are more willing to consider and to resolve these problems. Similarly, they do not feel aggrieved, but recognize that such problems are part of the human experience, prompting a more proactive rather than helpless reaction.

 

Consequences of self-compassion: Motivation and performance

Self-compassion also elicits more desirable and productive motivations. To illustrate, as Magnus, Kowalski, and McHugh (2010) revealed, some individuals experience an intrinsic motivation to exercise, perceiving this activity as enjoyable or engaging. They endorse items such as "I exercise because it's fun". According to self-determination theory, this form of motivation often enhances engagement and persistence.

 

In contrast, some individuals experience motivations that are not as adaptive. They might be governed by an extrinsic motivation to exercise. They exercise to please someone else or to seek some reward, endorsing items like "I exercise because other people say I should". Similarly, they might experience introjected motivation. That is, their behavior might be dictated by feelings of guilt or pride, depending on their behavior, endorsing items like "I feel guilty when I don't exercise". Furthermore, some individuals exercise merely to demonstrate their capacity to outperform other people, called an ego goal orientation. These motivations can culminate in a sense of obligation or obsession with exercise, in which individuals feel irritable, depressed, or other negative emotions whenever they fail to exercise.

 

Magnus, Kowalski, and McHugh (2010) showed that self-compassion was positively associated with intrinsic motivation to exercise. Furthermore, self-compassion was negatively related to extrinsic motivation, introjected motivation, and ego goal orientation.

 

Specifically, when individuals experience self-compassion, they accept themselves. Hence, they do not feel the need to outperform anyone else to boost their sense of worth. They will, therefore, not be governed by the expectations of other people to the same extent. They can orient their attention to their underlying values, interests, and passions. Intrinsic motivation will override extrinsic motivation, introjected motivation, and an ego goal orientation.

 

Similar results have been observed in academic settings.  Self-compassion, for example, is positively related to intrinsic motivations to learn and adaptive coping strategies after academic failure (Neff, Hseih, & Dejitthirat, 2005). Self-compassion also tends to coincide with personal initiative—in which change themselves and their environment to ensure their life is more fulfilling-and curiosity.  They pursue novel and challenging experiences (Neff, Rude, & Kirkpatrick, 2007). Indeed, these relationships tend to persist even after personality is controlled (Neff, Rude, & Kirkpatrick, 2007).

 

Consequences of self-compassion: Motivation to change versus complacency

Despite the established benefits of self-compassion, many individuals are concerned this state might promote complacency.  That is, if individuals accept their flaws, they might not feel inspired to change.  In contrast, if individuals reprimand themselves, they may feel more inspired to change.  Indeed, one of the main reasons that many people do not experience self-compassion is because they belief this state might be detrimental to their life, motivation, and performance (Chwyl et al., 2021)

 

However, as Breines and Chen (2012) showed, when individuals experience self-compassion, they do not become more complacent. Actually, these individuals become especially motivated to change. In particular, because of their self-compassion, they accept, rather than deny, their faults. They become willing to contemplate, and therefore, address, these shortcomings. They attempt activities in which they may not succeed, because they are not afraid of failure.  Because they are willing to address their shortcomings, they develop the belief they can change, increasing their receptivity to feedback and advice.

 

Breines and Chen (2012) conducted four studies that verify these arguments. In the first study, participants were asked to reflect upon one of their weaknesses. Next, to induce self-compassion, some participants imagined they were talking to themselves about this weakness from a compassionate and understanding perspective. In one of the control conditions, to inflate self-esteem instead, participants imagined they were talking to themselves about this weakness by emphasizing their qualities and strengths. In another control condition, participants did not engage in either of these exercises. Finally, all participants were asked to write about this weakness, emphasizing the source of this shortfall as well as activities they have undertaken previously to redress this deficiency.

 

Relative to the other conditions, if self-compassion had been induced, participants were more likely to write about the prospect they can change. They included statements like "With hard work I know I can change it" rather than "It's just inborn, there's nothing I can do".

 

The second study was similar, except participants contemplated a time in which they behaved immorally and experienced guilt rather than recorded a weakness. In addition, after self-compassion or self-esteem had been induced, participants were asked to indicate the extent to which they would like to address this transgression, completing questions such as "I wish I could go back and erase what happened," "I want to confess", and "I want to apologize". If self-compassion had been induced, participants were especially motivated to redress past indiscretions or transgressions.

 

The third study showed that self-compassion can even encourage people to practice more extensively on tasks. In this study, participants completed a challenging vocabulary task. They were granted time to practice before completing the test again. If self-compassion had been induced, participants dedicated more time to practice. The final study showed that self-compassion inspired people to reflect upon someone who had previously shared their weakness but had triumphed, called an upward comparison, rather than someone whose weaknesses were even more pronounced than were their own, called a downward compassion. Upward comparisons are more likely to inspire people, but not more likely to boost self-esteem.

 

Consequences of self-compassion: Relationships

Self-compassion has also been shown to foster positive, adaptive behavior in romantic relationships. That is, as Neff and Beretvas (2013) showed, if individuals report elevated levels of self-compassion, they are more likely, according to their partners, to be caring, affectionate, and gentle as well as discuss problems, respect other opinions, and encourage autonomy. They are less likely to control the other person, seem detached, or exhibit signs of aggression, such as shouting. Indeed, self-compassion is related to these positive behaviors even after controlling self-esteem and attachment style.

 

Several accounts could be proposed to explain these findings. First, self-compassion enhances resilience, enabling individuals to resolve and to discuss challenging matters. Second, when individuals exhibit self-compassion, they shower themselves with kindness, care, and belonging. They may not be as reliant on other people to fulfill these needs and, therefore, encourage freedom and autonomy in relationships. Third, when people experience self-compassion, they accept fallibilities in themselves and, thus, in other individuals as well.

 

Self-compassion improves other relationships as well.  At times in which leaders experience self-compassion towards themselves, they tend to help other staff more effectively on both personal matters and work tasks (Lanaj et al., 2021).  These leaders, therefore, tend to be perceived as more competent as well as civil.

 

Consequences of self-compassion: Workplaces

As a review by Dodson and Heng (2022), self-compassion in staff can significantly improve the workplace.  Specifically, when staff experience self-compassion

 

  • they are not as susceptible to burnout (e.g., Schabram, K., & Heng, 2022; Vaillancourt & Wasylkiw, 2020)

  • they are more inclined to feel satisfied at work (e.g., Voci et al., 2016)

  • they are more likely to be perceived as effective leaders (e.g., Waldron & Ebbeck, 2015)

  • they are mor likely to perform effectively as well as collaboratively (Reizer, 2019)

 

Determinants of self-compassion: Self-compassion exercises

Because self-compassion tends to be a beneficial state, many scholars and practitioners have explored techniques and practices that could foster self-compassion.  As this research shows, people can learn to experience self-compassion.  One study even revealed that a training program of nurses, lasting only one day, was sufficient to foster self-compassion and reduce anxiety (Franco & Christie, 2021).  During this training session

 

  • participants wrote compassionate notes to themselves

  • participants consider the difference between how they treat their friends and themselves in response to challenging events

  • participants learned a behavior or gesture that epitomizes compassion towards themselves.

 

Likewise, Shapira and Mongrain (2010) implemented and assessed a procedure that fosters self-compassion. Specifically, each day, over a week, participants were asked to reflect upon an event that unfolded during the day that evoked negative emotions. Next, they were asked to write a short letter to themselves, in first person, comprising one paragraph, about this event. Specifically, they were asked to remember occasions in which they were kind and understanding to other people. They were then asked to consider what they would say, in this state, to a friend who had experienced a similar event. Alternatively, they could think about the words that a friend would say to offer support.

 

To offer this support, they should express understanding or empathy towards this distress. They could write "I feel sad that you feel distressed". They could also indicate they feel the distress is understandable, with words like "It is natural to feel upset in this situation". Finally, they would offer soothing words to offer encouragement.

 

In the control condition, each day, over the week, participants were asked to write about an early memory of their life. They described the activities they were undertaking, the feelings they were experiencing, and the people with whom they were interacting, if they could remember.

 

One week, one month, three months, and six months after this intervention, participants completed a series of measures that assessed their wellbeing. These measured included scales that gauge depression and happiness. Furthermore, they completed a questionnaire of self-criticism, neediness, and connectedness.

 

Relative to the control condition, participants who wrote compassionate letters to themselves experience greater happiness over the next six months. This intervention also diminished depression over the next three months. Connectedness partly mediated these benefits of self-compassion.

 

Breines and Chen (2012a) also developed similar exercises to foster self-compassion. For example, in this study, participants were instructed to reflect upon a weakness, transgression, or failure. To induce self-compassion, participants imagined they were talking to themselves about this weakness from a compassionate and understanding perspective. In one study, they were also encouraged to adopt a caring and concerned, rather than critical, approach. In another study, they were also asked to recognize that such failure is common and they should not be too hard on themselves. After self-compassion had been induced, participants were more likely to feel inspired to improve themselves.

 

Determinants of self-compassion: Helping other people

After individuals help someone, or remember a time in which they helped someone, they are more inclined to feel self-compassion (Breines & Chen, 2012b). Presumably, these helpful behaviors or memories prime schemas that shape how individuals support themselves. In particular, the tendency of individuals to support another person is extended to themselves.

 

For example, in one study, conducted by Breines and Chen (2012b), participants first wrote about a recent event in which they experienced a feeling of failure, rejection, or humiliation—an event in which self-compassion is most important. Next, they were asked to recall a time in which they either helped a friend or experienced fun with a friend. Finally, they completed a measure that gauges the extent to which they feel self-compassion towards this failure or humiliation. Compared to participants who imagined a time in which they experienced fun with a friend, participants who imagined a time in which they helped a friend were more likely to report self-compassion. A subsequent study showed that actually writing advice to help someone also enhanced self-compassion. These findings were not mediated by changes in affect or self-esteem.

 

Determinants of self-compassion: Yoga

Some variants of yoga have been shown to foster self-compassion as well as mindfulness. Gard, Brach, Holzel, Noggle, Conboy, and Lazar (2012) verified the benefits of a specific program of yoga—Kripalu yoga—on self-compassion. The program spans four months. This program is targeted at individuals aged between 18 and 25. Each day, the students engage in three to five hours of practice. The practice entails postures, breathing exercises, and meditation. In addition, participants are engaged in three to five hours of tutorials, in which they learn about how to integrate yoga with everyday life as well as other life skills.

 

One of the key features of this yoga program was the concept of witness consciousness. Witness consciousness, like mindfulness, refers to the capacity of individuals to observe their environment and their experience without judgment or reactivity. Five skills facilitate witness consciousness. Specifically, individuals are encouraged to orient their attention to the sensation of breath, to orient their attention to other momentary sensations, feelings, and thoughts, to learn how to accept, rather than judge, these experiences, and to learn how to relax. Compassion is also a central feature of this program.

 

Relative to a matched control group, participants who engaged in this program exhibited greater self-compassion, as gauged by all facets besides common humanity.  Indeed, self-compassion partly mediated the observed association between yoga and reduced stress.

 

Measure of self-compassion

The most established measure of self-compassion, formulated by Ness (2003a), comprises six subscales. In particular, the measure includes one positive subscale and one negative subscale for each of three themes that underpin self-compassion.

 

The subscales include self-kindness (e.g., "When I'm going through a very hard time, I give myself the caring and tenderness I need"), self-judgment (e. g., "When I see aspects of myself that I don't like, I get down on myself"), common humanity (e.g., "When I feel inadequate in some way, I try to remind myself that feelings of inadequacy are shared by most people."), isolation (e.g., "When I fail at something that's important to me, I tend to feel alone in my failure"), mindfulness (e.g., "When something upsets me I try to keep my emotions in balance."), and over-identification (e.g., "When I'm feeling down I tend to obsess and fixate on everything that's wrong"). The psychometric properties of this scale are promising (see Neff, 2003a).

 

Neurological correlates of self-compassion

Self-compassion tends to coincide with a distinct pattern in the brain.  For example, as Guan et al. (2021) showed, in people who report self-compassion—especially in people who do not evaluate themselves harshly—gray matter volume in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tends to smaller. The reason is not certain but might indicate that self-compassion enhances the capacity of individuals to regulate emotions seamlessly, decreasing reliance on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

 

References

  • Bastian, B., Jetten, J., & Fasoli, F. (2010). Cleansing the soul by hurting the flesh: The guilt-reducing effect of pain. Psychological Science, 22, 334-335.

  • Breines, J. G., & Chen, S. (2012a). Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1133-1143.

  • Breines, J. G., & Chen, S. (2012b). Activating the inner caregiver: The role of support-giving schemas in increasing state self-compassion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 58-64.

  • Chio, F. H., Mak, W. W., & Ben, C. L. (2021). Meta-analytic review on the differential effects of self-compassion components on well-being and psychological distress: The moderating role of dialecticism on self-compassion. Clinical Psychology Review, 85, 101986.

  • Chwyl, C., Chen, P., & Zaki, J. (2021). Beliefs about self-compassion: Implications for coping and self-improvement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(9), 1327-1342.

  • Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP Scale. A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 947-966.

  • Dodson, S. J., & Heng, Y. T. (2022). Self‐compassion in organizations: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(2), 168-196.

  • Ewert, C., Vater, A., & Schröder-Abé, M. (2021). Self-compassion and coping: a meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 12(5), 1063-1077.

  • Exline, J. J., Root, B. L., Yadavalli, S., Martin, A. M., & Fisher, M. L. (2011). Reparative behaviors and self-forgiveness: effects of a laboratory-based exercise. Self and Identity, 10, 101-126.

  • Franco, P. L., & Christie, L. M. (2021). Effectiveness of a one day self-compassion training for pediatric nurses’ resilience. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 61, 109-114.

  • Gard, T., Brach, N., Holzel, B. K., Noggle, J. J., Conboy, L. A., & Lazar, S. W. (2012). Effects of a yoga-based intervention for young adults on quality of life and perceived stress: The potential mediating roles of mindfulness and self-compassion. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 165-175.

  • Guan, F., Liu, G., Pedersen, W. S., Chen, O., Zhao, S., Sui, J., & Peng, K. (2021). Neurostructural correlates of dispositional self-compassion. Neuropsychologia, 160

  • Kroshus, E., Hawrilenko, M., & Browning, A. (2021). Stress, self-compassion, and well-being during the transition to college. Social Science & Medicine, 269.

  • Lanaj, K., Jennings, R. E., Ashford, S. J., & Krishnan, S. (2021). When leader self-care begets other care: Leader role self-compassion and helping at work. Journal of Applied Psychology.

  • Leary, M. R., Tate, E. B., Adams, C. E., Allen, A. B., & Hancock, J. (2007). Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events: The implications of treating oneself kindly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92, 887-904.

  • Magnus, C. M. R., Kowalski, J. C., & McHugh, T. F. (2010). The role of self-compassion in women's self-determined motives to exercise and exercise-related outcomes. Self and Identity, 9, 363-382.

  • Neff, K. D. (2003a). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223-250.

  • Neff, K. D. (2003b). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85-102.

  • Neff, K. D. & Vonk, R. (2009). Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: Two different ways of relating to oneself. Journal of Personality, 77, 23-50.

  • Neff, K. D., & Beretvas, S. N. (2013). The role of self-compassion in romantic relationships. Self and Identity, 12, 78-98.

  • Neff, K. D., Hseih, Y., & Dejitthirat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4, 263-287.

  • Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L., & Rude, S. S (2007). Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 139-154.

  • Neff, K. D., Rude, S. S., & Kirkpatrick, K. L. (2007). An examination of self-compassion in relation to positive psychological functioning and personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 908-916.

  • Pérez-Aranda, A., García-Campayo, J., Gude, F., Luciano, J. V., Feliu-Soler, A., González-Quintela, A., ... & Montero-Marin, J. (2021). Impact of mindfulness and self-compassion on anxiety and depression: The mediating role of resilience. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 21(2).

  • Reizer, A. (2019). Bringing self-kindness into the workplace: Exploring the mediating role of self-compassion in the associations between attachment and organizational outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10

  • Schabram, K., & Heng, Y. T. (2022). How other-and self-compassion reduce burnout through resource replenishment. Academy of Management Journal, 65(2), 453-478.

  • Schaumberg, R. L., & Flynn, F. J. (2012). Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown: The link between guilt proneness and leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 327-342.

  • Shapira, L. B., & Mongrain, M. (2010). The benefits of self-compassion and optimism exercises for individuals vulnerable to depression. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 377-389.

  • Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford.

  • Tangney, J. P., Boone, A. L., & Dearing, R. (2005). Forgiving the self: Conceptual issues and empirical findings. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 143-158). New York: Routledge.

  • Terry, M. L., Leary, M. R., Mehta, S., & Henderson, K. (2013). Self-compassionate reactions to health threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 911-926.

  • Vaillancourt, E. S., & Wasylkiw, L. (2020). The intermediary role of burnout in the relationship between self-compassion and job satisfaction among nurses. Canadian journal of nursing research, 52(4), 246-254.

  • Voci, A., Veneziani, C. A., & Bernardi, S. (2016). Dispositional mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of work-related well-being. Psicologia Sociale, 11(1), 69-88.

  • Wakelin, K. E., Perman, G., & Simonds, L. M. (2022). Effectiveness of self‐compassion‐related interventions for reducing self‐criticism: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 29(1), 1-25.

  • Waldron, A. L., & Ebbeck, V. (2015). The relationship of mindfulness and self-compassion to desired wildland fire leadership. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 24(2), 201-211.

White Structure

Thought acceleration

Overview

Thought acceleration is the tendency to think very rapidly.  Interestingly, after individuals deliberately think rapidly, they experience a range of benefits (for a review, see Yang & Pronin, 2018). For example, their mood, self-esteem, creativity, and other capacities improve.  Nevertheless, thought acceleration is seldom applied in tertiary education, representing an opportunity that many institutions could utilize in the future.

 

Consequences of thought acceleration: Mood and self-esteem

Pronin and Wegner (2006) as well as Pronin, Jacobs, and Wegner (2008) demonstrated that rapid thinking can elicit feelings of enthusiasm, excitement, alertness, determination, inspiration, pride, creativity, and happiness—called positive affect—without significantly provoking unpleasant emotions, such as distress, hostility, or irritability.  That is, when individuals choose to think rapidly, they experience these benefits.  In contrast, when individuals must think rapidly merely because they feel inundated with work, they do not experience these benefits.

 

These researchers applied a variety a protocols to accelerate thought.  To illustrate, in one study, conducted by Pronin, Jacobs, and Wegner (2008), participants were granted 10 minutes to uncover suggestions on how a course could be streamlined. To accelerate thoughts, some participants were told to record as many solutions as possible, regardless of their feasibility. In the control, participants were told to record only solutions that are feasible.

 

Participants who recorded as many thoughts as possible reported more positive affect. They were more also likely to experience a sense their thoughts were racing. They did not report elevated levels of negative affect, fortunately.

 

The other studies conducted by Pronin, Jacobs, and Wegner (2008) were similar, except other procedures were utilized to manipulate thought acceleration. In the second study, for example, participants were also asked to uncover suggestions on how a course could be streamlined. However, to manipulate thought acceleration, they were first exposed to the solutions of other participants-either at a rate that was marginally faster than typical reading speed or a rate that was nine times slower.

 

In the fourth study, undertaken by Pronin, Jacobs, and Wegner (2008), to accelerate the rate of thoughts, participants received simple questions, like "Identify words that rhyme with mite". In the control condition, participants received more difficult questions like "Identify words that rhyme with speck"-that is, questions with fewer answers.

 

In the fifth study that was conducted by Pronin, Jacobs, and Wegner (2008), participants watched a silent video clip either in fast motion, to accelerate thinking, or at two slower speeds. Their task was to narrate aloud the events that transpired.

Finally, in the sixth study that was conducted by Pronin, Jacobs, and Wegner (2008), as well as in the study that was undertaken by Pronin and Wegner (2006), participants were asked to read sentences aloud. Each letter appeared in sequence. Once a line of text materialized, the letters then disappeared. The sentences appeared on the screen at various rates.

 

In each of these studies, positive affect, as gauged by self-report measures, was elevated when rapid thinking was induced. Self-esteem, as measured by questions like "I feel confident about my abilities", also improved. Negative affect, however, was not affected by thought acceleration.

 

Usually, the relationship between thought acceleration and positive affect was mediated by subjective experiencing of rapid or racing thoughts. In addition, when tested, no differences between reading or thinking at a conventional rate and reading or thinking at a slow rate emerged.

 

This benefit of thought acceleration has been observed in a range of individuals.  For example, as Yang et al. (2014) revealed, thought acceleration enhances mood even in people who report moderate levels of depression.  However, this technique did not improve the mood of individuals who exhibited severe levels of depression. 

 

Previous studies have also uncovered results that verify the benefits of thought acceleration. Teasedale and Rezin (1978), for example, showed that depression is more likely to diminish after individuals are asked to repeat letters that appear on a screen, especially if these characters are presented at a rapid rate of 1 every second.

 

Consequences of thought acceleration: Creativity

Thought acceleration may also foster creativity.  For example, Yang and Pronin (2018) described a study that corroborates this possibility. Participants watched a series of trivia statements, presented on a YouTube video.  The statements were presented either at either a rapid or moderate rate.  To assess the capacity of individuals to uncover creative insights, participants completed the rapid association test—in which they needed to identify one word that corresponds to three other words, such as cracker, fly, fighter.  In this example, the answer is fire.  To assess the capacity of individuals to generate creative thoughts, participants were instructed to write poems that conform to a specific pattern. 

 

The results were interesting but not straightforward.  Thought acceleration improved performance on the remote association task and, therefore, enhanced creative insight.  However, thought acceleration did not significantly enhance performance on the poetry task.

 

Consequences of thought acceleration: Risk taking

Thought acceleration has also been shown to promote risky intentions and behaviors.  In the one study, conducted by Chandler and Pronin (2012), participants had to read text that was presented either rapidly, to promote thought acceleration, or slowly.  If participants read this text rapidly, they were subsequently more inclined to invest their money into risky, uncertain alternatives. 

 

In the second study, participants were exposed to movie clips that were presented rapidly or slowly.  If participants had been exposed to a rapid sequence of clips, they were more likely to form the intention to engage in unprotected sex, consume illegal drugs, or consider other risky acts. 

 

Theoretical explanations

Pronin, Jacobs, and Wegner (2008) offered three accounts of the mechanisms that might underpin the benefits of thought acceleration. First, thought acceleration might be regarded as a cue that individuals are experiencing a positive mood. Pronin and Jacobs (2007), as cited by Pronin, Jacobs, and Wegner (2008), showed that individuals tend to believe that rapid thinking symbolizes positive moods. Hence, when individuals think rapidly, they might infer that perhaps they are experiencing a positive mood.

 

Second, accelerated thinking increases the incidence of novel thoughts at a rapid, or intense, rate. Novel, intense experiences increase the activation of dopaminergic activity in the brain (Berridge & Robinson, 2003; Horvitz, 2002; Schultz, 2001). Such activity is associated with the subjective experience of reward and pleasure. Consistent with this premise, drugs that facilitate dopaminergic activity, such as cocaine, both instill rewarding mood states and facilitate the acceleration of thoughts (Asghar, Tanay, Baker, Greenshaw, & Silverstone, 2003).

 

Indeed, Hirt, Devers, and McCrea (2008) demonstrated that individuals often engage in creative thoughts, reflecting upon novel concepts, to improve their mood. Hence, accelerated thinking might activate a more diverse range of concepts, improving mood.

 

Third, rapid thinking instills the sense that individuals can process information fluently. This sense of fluency or ease has been shown to associated with positive mood states (see Winkielman, Schwarz, Fazendeiro, & Reber, 2003).

 

Alternative explanations: Distraction

Thought acceleration could also be ascribed to the distraction of thoughts.  Van Dillen and Koole (2007) maintain that cognitive operations that consume working memory often curb dejection and thus improve positive mood. In particular, challenging mental activities utilize working memory and thus disrupt the negative thoughts that dejection or depression can evoke. As these negative thoughts dissipate, mood tends to improve (for a similar perspective, see Teasdale & Rezin, 1978).

 

Other research has also substantiated the benefits of distraction.  For example, in one study, conducted by Strick, Holland, van Baaren, and van Knippenberg (2009), participants observed a series of photographs, some of which were quite upsetting.  After each photograph, some pleasant prose, such as a joke or a romantic sentence, was presented.  Then, after each prose, participants rated their feelings.   Upsetting photographs were not as likely to evoke negative feelings if followed by a joke than if followed by prose that was not humorous but equally positive.  According to the researchers, humor demands appreciable cognitive effort to reconcile the underlying conflict, and this cognitive effort distracts attention from negative thoughts. 

 

References

  • Asghar, S. J., Tanay, V. A. M. I., Baker, G. B., Greenshaw, A., & Silverstone, P. H. (2003). Relationship of plasma amphetamine levels to physiological, subjective, cognitive, and biochemical measures in healthy volunteers. Human Psychopharmacology, 18, 291-299.

  • Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 507-513.

  • Chandler, J. J., & Pronin, E. (2012). Fast thought speed induces risk taking. Psychological Science, 23, 370-374. doi:10.1177/0956797611431464

  • Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 214-230.

  • Horvitz, J. C. (2002). Dopamine gating of glutamatergic sensorimotor and incentive motivational input signals to the striatum. Behavioural Brain Research, 137, 65-74.

  • Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Kazen, M., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Intention memory and achievement motivation: Volitional facilitation and inhibition as a function of affective contents of need-related stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 426-448.

  • Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and volition: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research (pp. 111-169). New York: Academic Press.

  • Pronin, E., & Wegner, D. M. (2006). Manic thinking: Independent effects of thought speed on thought content and mood. Psychological Science, 17, 807-815.

  • Pronin, E., Jacobs, E., & Wegner, D. M. (2008). Psychological effects of thought acceleration. Emotion, 8, 597-612.

  • Schultz, W. (2001). Reward signaling by dopamine neurons. Neuroscientist, 7, 293-302.

  • Strick, M., Holland, R. W., van Baaren, R. B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2009). Finding comfort in a joke: Consolatory effects of humor through cognitive distraction.  Emotion, 9, 574-578.

  • Teasdale, J. D., & Rezin, V. (1978). The effects of reducing frequency of negative thoughts on the mood of depressed patients-test of a cognitive model of depression. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 65-74.

  • Van Dillen, L. & Koole, S. L. (2007). Clearing the mind: A working memory model of distraction from negative mood. Emotion, 7, 715-723.

  • Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Yang, K., & Pronin, E. (2018). Consequences of thought speed. in advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 167-222). Academic Press.

  • Yang, K., Friedman-Wheeler, D. G., & Pronin, E. (2014). Thought acceleration boosts positive mood among individuals with minimal to moderate depressive symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(3), 261-269

White Structure

Mindfulness

Introduction to mindfulness

Many people have completed exercises that are designed to promote mindfulness.  To illustrate, they might attend a session or listen to some instructions on YouTube, accompanied by serene music.  For example, they might receive instructions that resemble these words:

 

  • Sit on a comfortable seat and close your eyes

  • Direct your attention to your breath

  • Inhale slowly, observing how the air fill your lungs.  Then, exhale slowly, allowing the air to escape your lungs

  • Inhale again slowly. Then exhale again slowly

  • Observe how your stomach rises as you inhale and then falls as you exhale.

  • If your mind wanders, gently attend to your breath again, whenever you can

 

  • Now observe some of the feelings or sensations that pervade your body

  • Perhaps start with your forehead?

  • Does your forehead feel cool, light, relaxed, and comfortable?

  • Do not force your forehead to feel cool, light, relaxed, and comfortable?

  • But simply observe the feelings in your forehead

  • Now shift your attention to your cheeks. 

  • Do your cheeks feel cool, light, relaxed, and comfortable?

  • Or perhaps you feel another sensation or even no sensation in your cheeks at all

  • Now shift your attention to your shoulders and observe the feelings—and then your back, chest, arms, hands, stomach, legs, and feet.

 

  • Now observe the thoughts that enter your head

  • Perhaps you notice some worries, some doubts, or some memories of the past or daydreams about the future

  • Imagine these thoughts are like messages on the radio—messages that you can louden or soften or even erase altogether

  • Do not worry if these thoughts are good or bad, pleasant or unpleasant

  • Just watch your thoughts, as if you another person, eavesdropping with curiosity but not concern

 

This exercise, and similar activities, have been shown to foster a state of mindfulness.  In this state, people tend to be aware of their immediate surroundings as well as their ongoing thoughts and feelings (Brown & Ryan, 2003). When eating a meal, for example, they may direct their attention to the immediate tastes as well as feel aware of their increasing sense of satiation or even the distention of their stomach (Brown & Ryan, 2003).  But, in a mindful state, individuals merely observe, rather than evaluate, these surroundings, thoughts, and feelings.  They do judge these experiences as good or bad.  They merely accept these experiences.

 

As research indicates, mindfulness can enhance the wellbeing of individuals. For example, if individuals do not experience mindfulness, they tend to feel mentally exhausted and drained whenever they need to multitask while they work or study.  In contrast, if individuals experience mindfulness, they can multitask without feeling exhausted (Kudesia et al., 2022)

 

Besides improving wellbeing, mindfulness meditation generates many other benefits as well. After people engage in mindfulness meditation, they feel more inspired to complete the tasks that feel meaningful—such as activities that resonate with their values, improve their relationships, or extend their capabilities (Smyth & Milyavskaya, 2021).  When people experience mindfulness, they are more likely to experience feelings of compassion.  They are more likely to behave supportively and cooperatively as well (Berry et al., 2020)—especially if they also feel a sense of connection to friends, family, or other social circles (Poulin et al., 2021).   Finally,when individuals experience this state of mindfulness, they negotiate and resolve matters significantly more effectively—because they are more concerned with the needs of everyone rather than only themselves (Masters-Waage et al., 2021).

 

Yet, in practice, because their lives are busy and unpredictable, people often do not experience mindfulness.  They might experience some emotion or even pain but are oblivious to this feeling or discomfort until later.  They might frequently engage in tasks but are not really aware of their behavior.  And they may become immersed in thoughts about their past or future instead of attending to ongoing activities.

 

Introduction to mindfulness at tertiary education institutions

Studies have explored the benefits of mindfulness in tertiary education institutions (e.g., Holyoke et a., 2022).  For example, research has often explored whether mindfulness improves the wellbeing of students.  In general, these studies indicate that mindfulness does indeed tend to diminish anxiety, depression, and stress to a moderate extent (Breedvelt et al., 2019). 

 

However, as Breedvelt et al. (2019) revealed, many of these studies are limited.  For example, these studies often compare the wellbeing of students who completed mindfulness exercises with the wellbeing of students who completed no exercises to improve mental health.  Potentially, when people complete any exercise that is designed to improve mental health, even some activity they are merely told might improve mental health, their mood could improve.

 

To explore this possibility, Breedvelt et al. (2019) reviewed studies that compared the wellbeing of students who completed mindfulness exercises with the wellbeing of students who completed other activities instead. In these studies, the benefits of mindfulness were only modest, but statistically significant. 

 

Besides wellbeing, research has also explored whether mindfulness interventions enhance the engagement of students.  For example, Ali et al. (2021) conducted a study in which postgraduate students completed measures that assess their tendency to be mindful, the degree to which they feel engaged and committed to their studies, as well as other psychological states, such as intrinsic motivation, hope, resilience, optimism and efficacy.  Individuals who tend to be mindful were more likely to feel engaged in their studies.  Intrinsic motivation, hope, resilience, optimism and efficacy mediated this relationship.  Presumably, mindfulness diminishes the intensity of worries, anxieties, and other distracting thoughts, promoting motivation, hope, resilience, optimism, and efficacy.

 

Definition of mindfulness: Key features

During a variety of mental states, such as rumination, people direct their attention towards their thoughts and feelings or towards their immediate surroundings.  However, when individuals experience mindfulness, they orient their attention towards the sensations, feelings, or experience—called experiential processing.  They do not orient their attention towards evaluation, judgment, or analysis, called analytical processing (Brown & Ryan, 2003)

 

More precisely, Germer (2005) defined the three interrelated constituents of mindfulness.  First, mindfulness involves a sense of awareness.  That is, individuals feel aware and attuned rather than hazy or vague.  Second, this awareness is directed to their ongoing experience. That is, individuals feel aware of their immediate experiences and environment—and do not direct their attention to past events or future possibilities.  Third, this awareness of ongoing experience is devoid of judgment, evaluation, and even elaboration (cf., Kabat-Zinn, 1994).  That is, their thoughts, feelings, sensations, and urges are all accepted rather than judged.

 

The term mindfulness can be used in different contexts.  That is, sometimes mindfulness refers to a description of some state—a state characterized as a sense of uncritical awareness of ongoing experience.  Alternatively, mindfulness can represent an intervention, usually involving meditation, in which individuals learn how to evoke this state of awareness. Finally, mindfulness can be conceptualized as a mental process, rather than as a state, underpinning self-regulation (Brown & Ryan, 2003) or acceptance (Linehan, 1994).

 

Definition of mindfulness: Key dimensions

Some scholars have proposed that mindfulness might entail multiple, distinct facets or dimensions. Bishop (2002), for example, distinguishes between awareness of ongoing experiences and the absence of any judgment or evaluation of these experiences.  Other scholars have challenged these attempts to enumerate the facets of mindfulness, conceptualizing this state or process as a unified phenomenon (e.g., Ivanovski & Malhi, 2007).

 

In addition, Holzel, Lazar, Gard, Shuman-Olivier, Vago, and Ott (2011) differentiated four main operations that underpin mindfulness mediation: regulation of attention, awareness of the body, regulation of emotion—entailing both reappraisal and exposure—and change in self-perspective. Baer (2003) argued that five mechanisms underpin the benefits of mindfulness training: exposure, cognitive change, self-management, relaxation, and acceptance. 

 

Definition of mindfulness: Evolution and history of this concep

Mindfulness ultimately emanated from Buddhist teachers. Nevertheless, several strands of research popularized the concept in psychological literature. For example, from a gestalt perspective, Perls (1973) contended that individuals develop alienated, neglected, or biased memories of experience. In a relaxed state, individuals can convert these experiences into clear perceptions.  These clear perceptions can be integrated into the self and promote wellbeing.

 

In the arena of psychology, mindfulness was first applied and evaluated formally as part of an approach, characterized by Kabat-Zinn (1982), called Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction.  Typically, the intervention lasts eight or so weeks and combines elements of mindfulness meditation and yoga.  Individuals learn how to maintain awareness of their immediate environment and experiences, while accepting themselves unconditionally rather than judging themselves critically.  Techniques include the body scan, in which individuals become aware of the feelings and sensations in each part of their body. In addition, individuals learn how to integrate these techniques into everyday life. Studies have demonstrated improvements in symptoms, lasting over 15 months, after individuals are exposed to this approach (Kabat-Zinn, Lipworth, & Burney, 1985)

 

Since this time, mindfulness has been embedded into other paradigms.  Specifically, mindfulness has been integrated with cognitive behavioral therapy, evolving into an approach called mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (Segal, Williams, & Teasdale, 2002).  Similarly, mindfulness is integral to acceptance and commitment therapy (Hayes & Wilson, 1994).  Finally, dialectical behavior therapy, as delineated by Linehan (1993), also represents mindfulness mediation as one of the five key facets. This therapy was first designed to treat borderline personality disorder.

 

In these paradigms, mindfulness meditation is assumed to be distinct from most alternative forms of meditation (see Lutz, Slagter, Dunne, & Davidson, 2008).  In many traditional forms of meditation, individuals attempt to orient their attention towards a single entity: a candle, a word, an image, and so forth. They attempt to distract their attention from all other objects and thoughts. In mindfulness meditation, however, individuals attempt to maintain awareness on any ongoing mental experiences or events. They do not necessarily confine their attention to one specific object or thought—although inadvertent fixation is possible (Lutz, Slagter, Dunne, & Davidson, 2008).  

 

Consequences of mindfulness

Mindfulness curbs the inclination of individuals to evaluate their thoughts, feelings, and circumstances, potentially diminishing the intensity of unpleasant emotions (Brown & Ryan, 2004a). Indeed, many studies have shown that training that is intended to facilitate mindfulness improves wellbeing (Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Shapiro, Schwartz, & Bonner, 1998; Teasdale, Segal, Williams, Ridgeway, Soulsby, & Lau, 2000).

 

Mindfulness is positively related to subjective wellbeing, life satisfaction, and self-esteem, as well as inversely related to depression and anxiety (Brown & Ryan, 2003). These relationships tend to persist even after emotional intelligence, private self-consciousness, neuroticism, and extraversion are controlled.

 

Consequences of mindfulness: Benefits in clinical setting

A variety of studies have shown that attempts to instill mindfulness can alleviate mood disorders.  That is, interventions that introduce or entail mindfulness have been shown to ameliorate symptoms of anxiety (Evans, Ferrando, Findler, Stowell, Smart, & Haglin, 2008), trauma (Follette, Palm, & Pearson, 2006) as well as depression (Kingston, Dooley, Bates, Lawlor, & Malone, 2007). 

 

Nevertheless, the benefits of mindfulness are not confined to mood disorders. Such interventions have also been shown to curb psychosis (Bach & Hayes, 2002; Gaudiano & Herbert, 2006), exhibitionism (Paul, Marx, & Orsillo, 1999), eating disorders (Telch, Agras, & Linehan, 2000), and other disorders.  Furthermore, even physical conditions, such as chronic pain (Kabat-Zinn, 1982) are amenable to the benefits of mindfulness.

 

Mindfulness is more likely to surface when individuals refrain from denying or suppressing previous failures and, therefore, tends to correspond to accurate rather than biased perceptions, promoting many benefits. Individuals who report a mindful disposition, for example, are less likely to exhibit pathological gambling because they do not overestimate the frequency of their victories—a common source of gambling problems (Lakey, Campbell, Brown, & Goodie, 2007).

 

Although these findings are certainly encouraging, not all of these studies establish whether a state of mindfulness does indeed mediate the benefits of these interventions.  Conceivably, some other properties of these interventions, such as the novelty, could improve measures of wellbeing.

 

Consequences of mindfulness: Decrease in defense mechanisms

Usually, when individuals are exposed to some threat, they are susceptible to a range of defense mechanisms, such as denial.  If people consider their own mortality, for example, they feel the need to defend their existing beliefs.  Mindfulness has been shown to curb these defensive responses (Niemiec et al., 2010).

 

For example, in one study, some participants were encouraged to consider their mortality—a threatening image.  Furthermore, the extent to which American participants subsequently prefer presentations that vindicate, rather than question, their nation was assessed—a measure of a defensive response.  If individuals reported low levels of trait mindfulness, these participants preferred presentations that vindicated their nation, epitomizing a defensive response.  If individuals reported elevated levels of trait mindfulness, this defensive response was not as pronounced.  That is, participants who maintain awareness of their feelings, sensations, and environment did not act as defensively in response to reminders of their death (Niemiec et al, 2010).

 

Consequences of mindfulness: Responsible behavior

Mindfulness can also inspire people to behave more responsibly rather than rashly or irresponsibly. 

As Papies, Barsalou, and Custers (2012) showed, mindfulness can diminish the desirability of temptations and, therefore, can reduce impulsivity.  Across a series of studies, some participants were subjected to a brief mindfulness intervention. They watched a sequence of pictures, including attractive foods.  They were asked to monitor and observe the thoughts that each picture evoked.  They were informed that such thoughts are merely responses to the pictures and are thus transient.  These instructions were intended to highlight that thoughts are not equivalent to reality but are merely fleeting events.  Other participants, in the control condition, received either no instructions or other instructions, depending on the study. 

 

Next, participants completed a task that determines the extent to which they feel the need to approach desirable food.  On each trial, either an attractive food item, such as pizza, or a neutral food item, such as raisins, appeared on a screen.  Participants were told to press one button to shift the food away from them and one button to shift the food closer.  The color of a frame around the food signaled whether they should shift the food away or closer.

 

In general, participants were faster on trials in which they had to shift an attractive food item closer to them--because they tend to approach such foods.  However, across all studies, if the participants had been subjected to the mindfulness intervention, this tendency diminished.  They did not demonstrate this inclination to approach attractive foods to the same extent.   

 

Consequences of mindfulness: Emotional intelligence

Mindfulness may also enhance the emotional intelligence of people—a quality that is valued in organizations today (Schutte & Malouff, 2011).  Emotional intelligence is the capacity to identify, understand, utilize, and regulate emotions effectively. To illustrate when individuals are mindful, their awareness is clear rather than hazy.  They can, therefore, differentiate similar, but distinct, emotions such as dejection and anxiety, facilitating the development of emotional intelligence.  Second, mindful individuals orient their attention towards ongoing experiences, instead of the past and future.  They may be, therefore, more sensitive to the gestures and mannerisms of people, enhancing their ability to decipher emotions.  Finally, because they do not judge their experiences, they are more immune to biases, increasing the accuracy of their appraisals of emotions.  

 

To assess this association between mindfulness and emotional intelligence, Schutte and  Malouff (2011) conducted a study.  Participants completed a measure of trait mindfulness.  This measure assesses the extent to which individuals focus their attention on their ongoing experience, but without judgment.  In addition, they completed a measure of emotional intelligence, designed to assess the capacity of individuals to identify, understand, harness, and manage emotions in both themselves and other people.   Finally, a measure of wellbeing, including positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction, was administered.

 

Mindfulness was associated with these indices of wellbeing.  Emotional intelligence partly or fully mediated these relationships.  Although a cross-sectional study, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that mindfulness enhances emotional intelligence.  This emotional intelligence enables individuals to regulate emotions affectively, enhancing their wellbeing.

 

Consequences of mindfulness: Empathy and cooperation

Training in mindfulness can also promote some, but perhaps not all, facets of empathy.  For example, in one study, conducted by Hopkins and Proeve (2013), some trainee psychologists participated in a program that entailed mindfulness based cognitive training.  The program comprised many features, such as a body scan, sitting meditation, hatha yoga, and observing thoughts.  In addition, participants learned how to integrate these principles into daily life.  At various times before and after the training, participants completed a series of scales, such as measures of perceived stress, mindfulness, and empathy.  The measure of empathy comprised four facets

 

Three of the four facets of empathy did not significantly change across time.  However, one facet, or the tendency of individuals to imagine themselves in fictional situations—an inclination that can impede interpersonal sensitivity—diminished after training and was maintained at least two months later.  Presumably, mindfulness, as predicted, enabled individuals to embed their attention within the interaction rather than shift their perspective to hypothetical settings.

 

Mindful individuals also tend to be cooperative and helpful at work.  Indeed, this benefit of mindfulness has been demonstrated in universities.  Tanova (2022), for example, conducted a study in a university in Cyprus.  As this study revealed, when individuals report elevated levels of mindfulness, they were more likely to help colleagues, accept inconveniences, suggest creative solutions to problems, and initiate other behaviors that are intended to improve the university.  

 

Consequences of mindfulness: Self-esteem

Mindfulness has also been shown to enhance self-esteem.  For example, in one study, conducted by Pepping, O'Donovan, and Davis (2013), participants completed the five-facet mindfulness questionnaire.  This instrument assesses the tendency of individuals to maintain awareness over their actions, rather than behave mindlessly, to describe or label their inner experiences, to refrain from judging their thoughts and feelings, to permit thoughts to enter their awareness without the need to suppress these experiences, and to observe their experiences.  In addition, the individuals completed a measure of self-esteem.  Besides observing experiences, all facets of mindfulness were positively associated with self-esteem. 

 

In a subsequent study, Pepping, O'Donovan, and Davis (2013) showed that a short mindfulness intervention enhanced state self-esteem.  That is, some participants completed a 15-minute intervention, in which they meditated on their breath and observed their thoughts without judging these experiences.  In the control condition, participants read a story.  The mindfulness intervention enhanced self-esteem.  Arguably, mindfulness diminishes the intensity of negative thoughts, such as doubts about personal capabilities. 

 

Consequences of mindfulness: Concentration and working memory

Mindfulness training has also been shown to enhance the capacity of people to excel on reading comprehension as well as enhance working memory.   Fewer distractions mediate or underpin these benefits of mindfulness training (Mrazek, Franklin, Phillips, Baird, & Schooler, 2013).

 

Specifically, in the study conducted by Mrazek, Franklin, Phillips, Baird, and Schooler (2013), half the participants completed mindfulness training over two weeks. During each week, they completed four classes, each lasing 45 minutes. Participants sat on cushions in a circle in an upright position with their gaze lowered. For 10 to 20 minutes, they engaged in mindfulness exercises, in which they directed their attention towards a sensory experience such as their breath, tastes, or sounds.  They shared their experiences with the class.  They were then encouraged to distinguish between thoughts that transpire naturally and elaborated thinking, to reframe distracting thoughts as mental projections in the present, to anchor their attention to their breath, to exhale deliberately, and to watch rather than suppress intrusive thoughts.  Individuals were also encouraged to apply these practices to daily activities.  In the control condition, participants completed training on nutrition instead over a similar timeframe.

 

A week later, participants completed a measure of reading comprehension and working memory.  To assess working memory, sequences of 3 to 7 letters were presented verbally, and participants needed to repeat these sequences.  Later, participants indicated the extent to which their mind wandered during these tasks.  Mindfulness enhanced performance on these tasks and reduced mind wandering. 

 

These findings are consistent with the notion that mindfulness diminishes activation of the default network--a collection of brain regions that are especially activated during rest rather than cognitive engagement.  This network is also associated with mind wandering.

 

Consequences of mindfulness: Creativity

Some but not all facets of mindfulness have been shown to enhance creativity (Baas, Nevicka, & Ten Velden, 2014). In particular, the capacity of individuals to observe and to orient their attention to many stimuli at the same time fosters this creativity. Other features of mindfulness, such as avoiding distractions, are not related or negatively related to creativity

 

For example, in one study, conducted by Baas, Nevicka, and Ten Velden (2014), participants completed a measure that gauges their capacity to maintain attention on their existing tasks rather than become distracted--one feature of mindfulness. In addition, to assess creativity, they were asked to identity all the possible uses of a brick.  The capacity to maintain attention and avoid distractions was actually negatively associated with creativity, as measured by frequency of ideas, even after controlling conscientiousness and neuroticism.

 

In another study, participants completed a scale that gauges several facets of mindfulness, such as the capacity to remain focused on the existing task and the ability to observe many stimuli, such as bodily sensations.  Only the capacity to observe many stimuli, such as thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations, was positively associated with various measures of creativity, including past creative achievements and original solutions to problems.

 

Arguably, when people can observe, notice, and attend to many thoughts, feelings, and sensations, their thinking becomes more flexible. They can more readily shift the focus of their attention and thus can contemplate a more diverse range of possibilities, enhancing creativity.  They may be able to uncover subtle cues that many people overlook.  So, training individuals to be aware of their thoughts, feelings, and sensations could foster creativity.  In contrast, attention to the existing task may not offer these benefits and, in some instances, stifle these benefits.

 

Antecedents of mindfulness

Several practices or tendencies can interfere with this awareness and attention, disrupting mindfulness, as delineated by Brown and Ryan (2003). First, rumination over the past or fantasies over the future can distract attention from ongoing events. Second, the distribution of attention to several concurrent tasks can also impede mindfulness. Third, habitual and automatic behavior, without any awareness or attention, reduces mindfulness. Finally, denial or suppression, often intended to circumvent undesirable emotions, also impairs mindfulness.

 

Theories to explain the benefits of mindfulness: Self-determination and autonomy

Self-determination theory, propounded by Deci and Ryan (1980, 1985), is sometimes invoked to explain the benefits of mindfulness (Brown & Ryan, 2003). In particular, mindfulness might correspond to an awareness of personal needs, values, and interests. Consequently, individuals are able to choose courses of action that align with their core values, promoting wellbeing (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

 

Consistent with this premise, Brown and Ryan (2003) showed that individuals who report elevated scores of mindfulness also feel their desire for autonomy, competence, and connections with other people are fulfilled. When individuals experience a state of mindfulness, they are also more inclined to engage in activities because they align to their value or interest, not because of demands from anyone else.

 

Antecedents of mindfulness: Future clarity

According to Moss et al. (2017), when individuals perceive their future as more certain and vivid, called future clarity, they may be more likely to experience mindfulness.  Specifically, the future, when perceived as certain and vivid, feels more important.  People become more inclined to sacrifice their pleasure now to benefit this future.  They are willing to complete unpleasant tasks to develop skills or capabilities that could be useful many years from now.   Therefore, they perceive unpleasant emotions as possible opportunities to improve and not as states to avoid.  This tendency to direct their attention towards all information, including unpleasant information, epitomizes mindfulness. Consistent with this reasoning, in their study, people who perceive the future as vivid and certain were also more likely to report elevated levels of mindfulness. 

 

Antecedents of mindfulness: Adverse childhood experiences

Conceivably, adverse childhood experiences, such as child abuse, may diminish mindfulness (for a review, see Cheung, et al., 2022).  That is, when children experienced painful adversities, and thus feel continually helpless and vulnerable, they learn to distract their attention from reality.  They might imagine a future that is devoid of pain and uncertainty.  Over time, this tendency to dissociate their attention from their painful reality, unpleasant thoughts, or powerful emotions becomes entrenched.  They are reluctant to observe their thoughts, feelings, and surroundings.  Cheung, et al. (2022) did indeed confirm that adverse experiences during childhood diminish the mindfulness of adults. 

 

Theories to explain the benefits of mindfulness: Modest desires

Mindfulness might also curb unrealistic goals and desires. In a study conducted by Brown, Kasser, Ryan, Linley, and Orzech (2009), for example, participants answered a series of questions that gauge their level of mindfulness as well as their current and desired financial status, with questions such as "How well does your current financial status right now approach what you want".  Furthermore, to gauge subjective wellbeing, these individuals answers questions that gauge their emotional state and satisfaction with life.

 

Mindfulness was inversely related to the discrepancy between current and desired financial status.  Interestingly, this relationship was observed even after annual income, household income, savings, debt, and assets were controlled. Thus, mindfulness seems to improve satisfaction with financial status, regardless of actual wealth.  Accordingly, when individuals experience a mindful orientation, their desired level of wealth seems to dissipate (Brown, Kasser, Ryan, Linley, & Orzech, 2009). Furthermore, the same pattern of results emerged when training was convened to manipulate levels of mindfulness (Brown, Kasser, Ryan, Linley, & Orzech, 2009). 

 

Several mechanisms might underpin the observation that mindfulness prevents lofty, unrealistic financial goals (see Burch, 2000; Rosenburg, 2004).  First, when individuals adopt a mindful orientation, they tend to appreciate their immediate subjective experiences in lieu of material goods.  The importance of wealth and status tends to wane (Brown & Kasser, 2005). Second, because mindful individuals are more attuned to their intrinsic desires, they might be less susceptible to advertising.  In contrast, the desired wealth of other individuals might soar after watching advertising campaigns and other social forces (Brown, Kasser, Ryan, Linley, & Orzech, 2009). Finally, when individuals demonstrate a mindful state, they are more likely to accept their circumstances and state (e.g., Baer, 2003).  This acceptance might extend to their financial status as well.

 

Theories to explain the benefits of mindfulness: Specific attributions

Mindfulness might also curb the inclination of individuals to form global negative evaluations about themselves.  To illustrate, some individuals extract broad negative attributions about themselves from specific events.  They might perceive themselves as hopeless in general after failures in specific circumstances only—an attribution style that is associated with depression.  This inclination to form global evaluations also coincides with memories of general, rather than specific, autobiographical events.  Mindfulness, in which individuals orient their attention to the specific circumstance, rather than connect event to past or future episode, has been shown to ameliorate this inclination and thus, at least sometimes, could prevent depression (Williams, Teasdale, Segal, & Soulsby, 2000).

 

Theories to explain the benefits of mindfulness: Cognitive defusion

Mindfulness meditation might increase the capacity of individuals to detach themselves from their thoughts.  Some individuals conceptualize their thoughts, such as the words "I am too fat", as a veridical reflection of reality.  Consequently, the responses that such reality might evoke--such as urges to shun social situations as well as feelings of shame--are also elicited by the thought (Masuda, Hayes, Sackett, & Twohig, 2004). 

 

After mindfulness training, however, individuals might assume that thoughts are not necessarily representations of reality.  These thoughts, instead, are conceptualized as transient, ephemeral events—a process called cognitive defusion (Hayes, 2003; Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999). 

 

After this realization, these unpleasant thoughts are less likely to evoke the sequence of responses that an authentic event might elicit. Instead, individuals can respond more flexibly rather than rigidly.  Furthermore, individuals do not feel the urge to inhibit, evade, or modify these thoughts.  These thoughts are not tangible problems that need to be defeated (cf., Baer, 2003). Even repeating an upsetting thought, deliberately and audibly, for over half a minute can foster these benefits (Masuda, Hayes, Sackett, & Twohig, 2004).

 

Indeed, many of the accounts and narratives that relate to mindfulness allude to this detachment from thoughts. Brown, Ryan, and Creswell (2007), for example, maintain that mindfulness instills a dissociation between the objects of which individuals are aware and the responses that such stimuli would usually evoke. Likewise, Kabat-Zinn (1990) introduced the concept of choiceless awareness, in which individuals become aware of some experience or object, without the need to engage, evaluate, or elucidate this stimulus.

 

Theories to explain the benefits of mindfulness: Relaxation

Conceivably, as several authors acknowledge (e.g., Dunn, Hartigan, & Mikulas, 1999), the benefits of mindfulness could merely be ascribed to positive emotions, such as relaxation. Certainly, mindfulness does reduce anxiety or arousal (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).  Despite the affective consequences of mindfulness meditation, such practices are not intended to improve emotional states immediately.  Indeed, mindfulness should enable individuals to experience and recognize negative affect rather than suppress or evade these emotions (e.g., Kabat-Zinn, 2003).  

 

Theories to explain the benefits of mindfulness: Diminution of defensive reactions

When individuals experience some problem or difficulty, a host of defensive reactions often ensue.  They might, for example, attempt to suppress their emotions or evade some setting in the future.  Similarly, they might divorce themselves from social interactions, because of a sense of distrust.

 

Some evidence indicates that mindfulness might preclude some of these defensive reactions.  Mindfulness, for example, is associated with acceptance of negative emotions or thoughts (Brown & Ryan, 2004; Hayes, 1994; Roemer & Orsillo, 2002).  Therefore, the inclination of individuals to suppress unpleasant emotions--an inclination that often aggravates these feelings (Wegner, 1994)—diminishes.

 

References

  • Ali, M., Khan, A. N., Khan, M. M., Butt, A. S., & Shah, S. H. H. (2021). Mindfulness and study engagement: Mediating role of psychological capital and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Professional Capital and Community.

  • Allen, N. B., Blashki, G., Chambers, R., Ciechomski, L., Gullone, E., Hassed, C., et al. (2006). Mindfulness-based psychotherapies: a review of conceptual foundations, empirical evidence and practical considerations. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 285-294.

  • Baas, M., Nevicka, B., & Ten Velden, F. S. (2014).  Specific mindfulness skills differentially predict creative performance.  Personality and Social and Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1092-1106. doi: 10.1177/0146167214535813

  • Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125-143.

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27-45.

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., et al. (2008). Construct validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15, 329-342.

  • Berry, D. R., Hoerr, J. P., Cesko, S., Alayoubi, A., Carpio, K., Zirzow, H., ... & Beaver, V. (2020). Does mindfulness training without explicit ethics-based instruction promote prosocial behaviors? A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1247-1269.

  • Bishop, R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson N. D., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230-241.

  • Bishop, S. R. (2002). What do we really know about mindfulness-based stress reduction? Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 71-84.

  • Breedvelt, J. J., Amanvermez, Y., Harrer, M., Karyotaki, E., Gilbody, S., Bockting, C. L., ... & Ebert, D. D. (2019). The effects of meditation, yoga, and mindfulness on depression, anxiety, and stress in tertiary education students: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychiatry, 10, 193.

  • Brown, D., Forte, M., & Dysart, M. (1984). Differences in visual sensitivity among mindfulness meditators and non-meditators. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 58, 727-733.

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822-848.

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2004a). Fostering healthy self-regulation from within and without: A self-determination theory perspective. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 105-124). New York: Wiley.

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2004b). Perils and promise in defining and measuring mindfulness: Observations from experience. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 242-248.

  • Brown, K. W., Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Linley, P. A., & Orzech, K. (2009).  When what one has is enough: Mindfulness, financial desire discrepancy, and subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 727-736.

  • Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211-237.

  • Burch, M. A. (2000). Stepping lightly: Simplicity for people and the planet. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.

  • Chambers, R. H., Lo, B. C. Y., & Allen, N. A. (2008). The impact of intensive mindfulness training on attentional control, cognitive style, and affect. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 303-322.

  • Cheung, S. P., Tu, B., & Huang, C. (2022). Adverse childhood experiences, mindfulness, and grit in college students in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.

  • Choi, E., Farb, N., Pogrebtsova, E., Gruman, J., & Grossmann, I. (2021). What do people mean when they talk about mindfulness? Clinical Psychology Review.

  • Chong, S., Kim, Y. J., Lee, H. W., Johnson, R. E., & Lin, S. H. J. (2020). Mind your own break! The interactive effect of workday respite activities and mindfulness on employee outcomes via affective linkages. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 159, 64-77.

  • Clough, P. J., Crawshaw, M., Levy, A., & Marchant, D. C. (2009).  Novice motor skill performance and task experience is influenced by attentional focusing instructions and instruction preferences.  International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7, 488-502.

  • Davidson, R. J., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S. F., et al. (2003). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 564-570.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1, 33-43.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

  • Dunn, B. R., Hartigan, J. A., & Mikulas, W. L. (1999). Concentration and mindfulness meditations: unique forms of consciousness? Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 24, 147-165.

  • Evans, S., Ferrando, S., Findler, M., Stowell, C., Smart, C., & Haglin, D. (2008). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 716-721.

  • Farb, N. A. S., Segal, Z. V., Mayberg, H., Bean, J., McKeon, D., Fatima, Z., et al. (2007). Attending to the present: mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference. SCAN, 2, 259-263.

  • Farb, N. A., Anderson, A. K., Mayberg, H., Bean, J., McKeon, D., & Segal, Z. V. (2010). Minding one's emotions: Mindfulness training alters the neural expression of sadness. Emotion, 10, 25-33. 

  • Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177-190.

  • Follette, V., Palm, K. M., & Pearson, A. N. (2006). Mindfulness and trauma: Implications for treatment. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 24, 45-61.

  • Germer, C. K. (2005). Mindfulness: what is it? What does it matter? In R. D. S. C. K. Germer, & P. R. Fulton (Ed.), Mindfulness and Psychotherapy. New York: The Guildford Press.

  • Hayes, S. C. (2003). Mindfulness: Method and process. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 161-165.

  • Hayes, S. C., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context of emotion regulation and the process of change in therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 255-262.

  • Hayes, S. C., & Shenk, C. (2004). Operationalizing mindfulness without unnecessary attachments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 249-254.

  • Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1994). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Altering the verbal support for experiential avoidance. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 289-303.

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., et al. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. Psychological Record, 54, 553-578.

  • Holyoke, L. B., Schiffelbein, K., Bryant, E., & Derrick, J. (2022). Exploring the transforming nature of a mindfulness course. Journal of Further and Higher Education.

  • Holzel, B. K., Ott, U., Gard, T., Hempel, H., Weygandt, M., Morgen, K., et al. (2007). Investigation of mindfulness meditation practitioners with voxel-based morphometry. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 55-61.

  • Holzel, K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Shuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work? proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 537-559. doi:10.1177/1745691611419671

  • Hopkins, A., & Proeve, M. (2013).   Teaching mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to trainee psychologists: Qualitative and quantitative effects. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 26(2), 115-130. doi:10.1080/09515070.2013.792998

  • Ivanovski, B., & Malhi, G. (2007). The psychological and neurophysiological concomitants of mindfulness forms of meditation. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 19, 76-91.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4, 33-47.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Delacorte.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness Meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present and future. Clinical Psychology, Science and Practice, 10, 144-156.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J., Lipworth, L., & Burney, R. (1985). The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 8, 163-190.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J., Massion, A. O., Kristeller, J., Peterson, L. G., Fletcher, K. E., Pbert, L., et al. (1992). Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 936-943.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J., Wheeler, E., Light, T., Skillings, A., Scharf, M., Cropley, T. G., et al. (1998). Influence of a mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention on rates of skin clearing in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis undergoing phototherapy (UVB) and photochemotherapy (PUVA). Psychosomatic Medicine, 60, 625-632.

  • Kaplan, K. H., Goldenberg, D. L., & Galvin-Nadeau, M. (1993). The impact of a meditation-based stress reduction program on fibromyalgia. General Hospital Psychiatry, 15, 284-289.

  • Kerr, C.E., Josyula K., & Littenberg R. (2011). Developing an observing attitude: An analysis of meditation diaries in an MBSR clinical trial. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18, 80-93.

  • Kingston, T., Dooley, B., Bates, A., Lawlor, E., & Malone, K. (2007). Mindfulness based cognitive therapy for residual depressive symptoms. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 80, 193-203.

  • Kristeller, J. L., & Hallett, B. (1999). Effects of a meditation-based intervention in the treatment of binge eating. Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 357-363.

  • Kudesia, R. S., Pandey, A., & Reina, C. S. (2022). Doing more with less: Interactive effects of cognitive resources and mindfulness training in coping with mental fatigue from multitasking. Journal of Management, 48, 410-439.

  • Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and volition: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research (pp. 111-169). New York: Academic Press.

  • Kumar, S., Feldman, G., & Hayes, S. C. (2008). Changes in mindfulness and emotion regulation in an exposure-based cognitive therapy for depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 734-744.

  • Kuyken, W., Byford, S., Taylor, R. S., Watkins, E., Holden, E., White, K., Barrett, B., Byng, R., Evans, A., Mullan, E., & Teasdale, J. D. (2008). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to prevent relapse in recurrent depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 966-978.

  • Lakey, C. E., Campbell, W. K., Brown, K. W., & Goodie, A. S. (2007). Dispositional mindfulness as a predictor of the severity of gambling outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1698-1710.

  • Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. Vermont, USA: Chelsea Green Publishing.

  • Lazar, S. W. (2005). Mindfulness research. In C. K. Germer, R. D. Siegel & P. R. Fulton (Eds.), Mindfulness and Psychotherapy. New York: The Guildford Press.

  • Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Wasserman, R. H., Gray, J. R., Greve, D. N., Treadway, M. T., McGarvey, M., Quinn, B. T., Dusek, J. A., Benson, H., Rauch, S. L., Moore, C. I., & Fischl, B. (2005). Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. Neuroreport, 16, 1893-1897.

  • Linehan, M. M. (1994). Acceptance and change: The central dialectic in psychotherapy. In S. C. Hayes, N. S. Jacobson, V. M. Follette & M. J. Dougher (Eds.), Acceptance and Change: Content and Context in Psychotherapy (pp. 73-86). Reno, NV: Context Press.

  • Lineman, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.

  • Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 163-169.

  • Ma, S. H., & Teasdale, J. D. (2004). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: replication and exploration of differential relapse prevention effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 31-40.

  • Mason, O., & Hargreaves, I. (2001). A qualitative study of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 74, 197-212.

  • Massion, A. O., Teas, J., Hebert, J., Wertheimer, M., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (1995). Meditation, melatonin and breast/prostate cancer: Hypothesis and preliminary data 1. Medical Hypotheses, 44, 39 - 46.

  • Masters-Waage, T. C., Nai, J., Reb, J., Sim, S., Narayanan, J., & Tan, N. (2021). Going far together by being here now: Mindfulness increases cooperation in negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 167, 189-205.

  • Masuda, A., Hayes, S. C., Sackett, C. F., & Twohig, M. P. (2004).  Cognitive defusion and self-relevant negative thoughts: Examining the impact of a ninety year old technique.  Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 477-485.

  • Modinos G., Ormel J., & Aleman A. (2010). Individual differences in dispositional mindfulness and brain activity involved in reappraisal of emotion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 369-377.

  • Moss, S. A., Wilson, S. G., Irons, M., & Cubillo, C. (2017).  The relationship between an orientation to the future and an orientation to the present: The role of future clarity.  Stress and Health, 33(5), 608-616

  • Mrazek, M. D., Franklin, M. S. Phillips, D. T., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2013).  Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering.  Psychological Science, 24, 776-781. doi: 10.1177/0956797612459659

  • Niemiec, C. P.,  Brown, K. W., Kashdan, T. B., Cozzolino, P. J., Breen, W. E., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Ryan, R. M.  (2010). Being present in the face of existential threat: The role of trait mindfulness in reducing defensive responses to mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 344-365.

  • Olafsen, A. H. (2017). The implications of need-satisfying work climates on state mindfulness in a longitudinal analysis of work outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 41(1), 22-37.

  • Papies, E. K., Barsalou, L. W., & Custers, R. (2012). Mindful attention prevents mindless impulses.  Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 291-299. doi: 10.1177/1948550611419031

  • Pepping, C. A., O’Donovan, A., & Davis, P. J. (2013).  The positive effects of mindfulness on self-esteem.  Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 376-386.

  • Perls, F. (1973). The gestalt approach and eye witness to therapy. New York: Bantam Books.

  • Poulin, M., Ministero, L., Gabriel, S., Morrison, C., Naidu, E., & Poulin, M. J. (2021). Minding your own business? Mindfulness decreases prosocial behavior for those with independent self-construals.  Psychological Science.

  • Ramel, W., Goldin, P. R., Carmona, P. E., & McQuaid, J. R. (2004). The effects of mindfulness meditation on cognitive processes and affect in patients with past depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 433-455.

  • Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2002). Expanding our conceptualisation of and treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: Integrating mindfulness/acceptance-based approaches with existing cognitive-behavioral models. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 54-68.

  • Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2003). Mindfulness: A promising intervention strategy in need of further study. Clinical Psychology, 10, 172-178.

  • Rosenberg, E. L. (2004). Mindfulness and consumerism. In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world (pp. 107-125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

  • Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process In cognitive therapy. New York: Basic Books.

  • Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. F. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 125-154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Schutte, N. S., &  Malouff, J. M. (2011). Emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between mindfulness and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1116-1119.

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulnessibased cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York: The Guildford Press.

  • Shapiro, S. L., Schwartz, G. E., & Bonner, G. (1998). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on medical and premedical students. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 581-599.

  • Shaver, P., Lavy, S., Saron, C., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Social foundations of the capacity for mindfulness: An attachment perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 264-271.

  • Siegel, D. J. (2007). The mindful brain: reflection and attunement in the cultivation of well-being. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

  • Smyth, A., & Milyavskaya, M. (2021). Mindfully motivated: Can a brief session of mindfulness meditation enhance motivation towards personal goals? European Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 758-772.

  • Speca, M., Carlson, L. E., Goodey, E., & Angen, M. (2000). A randomized, wait-list controlled clinical trial: The effect of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction program on mood and symptoms of stress in cancer outpatients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 613-622.

  • Stewart, T. M. (2004). Light on body image treatment: Acceptance through mindfulness. Behavior Modification, 28, 783-811.

  • Tacon, A. M., Caldera, Y. M., & Ronaghan, C. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction in women with breast cancer. Family Systems and Health, 22, 193-203.

  • Takahashi, T., Murataa, T., Hamadab, T., Omoria, M., Kosakaa, H., Kikuchic, M., et al. (2005). Changes in EEG and autonomic nervous activity during meditation and their association with personality traits. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 55, 199-207.

  • Tang, Y. Y., Ma, Y., Wang, J., Fan, Y., Feng, S., Lu, Q., et al. (2007). Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17152-17156.

  • Tanova, C. (2022). Can mindfulness improve organizational citizenship and innovative behaviors through its impact on well-being among academics? Psychological Report

  • Teasdale, J. D. (1999). Metacognition, mindfulness and the modification of mood disorders. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 6, 146-155.

  • Teasdale, J. D., Moore, R. G., Hayhurst, H., Pope, M., Williams, S., & Segal, Z. V. (2002). Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: Empirical evidence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 275-287.

  • Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., & Williams, M. G. (1995). How does cognitive therapy prevent depressive relapse and why should attentional control (mindfulness) training help? Behavioral Research Therapy, 33, 25-39.

  • Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., Ridgeway, V. A., Soulsby, J. M., & Lau, M. A. (2000). Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 615-625.

  • Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M., Ridgeway, V. A., Soulsby, J. M., & Lau, M. A. (2000). Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 615-623.

  • Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z., & Williams, J. M. (2003). Mindfulness training and problem formulation. Clinical Psychology, Science and Practice, 10, 157-160.

  • Telch, C. F., Agras, W. S., & Linehan, M. M. (2000). Group dialectical behavior therapy for binge-eating disorder: a preliminary, uncontrolled trial. Behavior Therapy, 31, 569--582.

  • Thompson, M., & Gauntlett-Gilbert, J. (2008). Mindfulness with children and adolescents: Effective clinical application. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13, 395-407.

  • Valentine, E. R., & Sweet, P. L. G. (1999). Meditation and attention: A comparison of the effects of concentrative and mindfulness meditation on sustained attention. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 2, 59-70.

  • Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34-52.

  • Williams, J. M. G., Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., & Soulsby, J. (2000). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy reduces overgeneral autobiographical memory in formerly depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 150-155.

The model university 2040: An encyclopedia of research and ideas to improve tertiary education

©2022 by The model university. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page